Pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis: scale development and validation

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Wei-Hsiang [1 ]
Shih, Shu-Fang [2 ]
Lin, Chen-Li [3 ]
Liu, Chieh-Hsing [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Hlth Promot & Hlth Educ, 162,Sec 1,Heping E Rd, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Taipei City Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 12 Fuzhou St, Taipei 100, Taiwan
关键词
Down syndrome; Screening and diagnosis; Attitudes; Decision-making; Validation; INFORMED CHOICE; 1ST-TRIMESTER; ABORTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-020-03093-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundDown syndrome is a common chromosomal abnormality and prenatal screening can inform parents of the risk of their baby having Down syndrome. Little research has examined how decisions regarding both Down syndrome screening as well as diagnosis are made among women who are currently pregnant and how their decisions are influenced by their social contexts, specifically family and social media, using mixed methods. The study was to test the validity and reliability of a scale that measures pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making concerning prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis in urban areas of Taiwan.MethodsWe developed an item pool based on a literature review and in-depth interviews with 30 pregnant women recruited at two district hospitals in urban areas. The item pool was reviewed by a panel of experts and then administered to 300 women who had been pregnant for less than 24weeks and had not received the Down syndrome screening tests. We used item analysis and exploratory factor analysis to validate the scale and test its reliability.ResultsThe initial item pool had 54 items. After the expert review, three items were deleted. After the item analysis, 16 additional items were deleted. Exploratory factor analysis of the remaining items revealed four factors labeled - "Attitudes towards Down syndrome and Screening Tests," "Important others' Attitudes towards Down Syndrome," "Influence of Important Others on Decision-Making," and "Influence of Social Media on Decision-Making" - and 16 of the remaining items had satisfactory loadings on those factors, explaining 72.0% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha values of the dimensions ranged between 0.75 and 0.90, demonstrating satisfactory internal reliability.ConclusionsThe scale has satisfactory validity and reliability, and can be used to understand pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding Down syndrome screening and diagnosis, and to help design tailored consultations for pregnant women in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pregnant women’s attitudes and decision-making regarding prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis: scale development and validation
    Wei-Hsiang Huang
    Shu-Fang Shih
    Chen-Li Lin
    Chieh-Hsing Liu
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20
  • [2] Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: women's involvement in decision-making and their attitudes to screening
    Seror, Valerie
    Ville, Yves
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 29 (02) : 120 - 128
  • [3] Similarities in women's decision-making in the US and UK during prenatal screening for Down's syndrome
    Haddow, JE
    Palomaki, GE
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1996, 16 (12) : 1161 - 1162
  • [4] Women's decision-making in prenatal screening
    Santalahti, P
    Hemminki, E
    Latikka, AM
    Ryynanen, MU
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 46 (08) : 1067 - 1076
  • [5] Decision-making process of prenatal screening described by pregnant women and their partners
    Watterbjork, Inger
    Blomberg, Karin
    Nilsson, Kerstin
    Sahlberg-Blom, Eva
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (05) : 1582 - 1592
  • [6] Ethnic differences in informed decision-making about prenatal screening for Down's syndrome
    Fransen, Mirjam P.
    Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
    Vogel, Ineke
    Mackenbach, Johan P.
    Steegers, Eric A. P.
    Wildschut, Hajo I. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2010, 64 (03) : 262 - 268
  • [7] Informed decision-making in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: What knowledge is relevant?
    Schoonen, H. M. H. J. D.
    van Agt, H. M. E.
    Essink-Bot, M. L.
    Wildschut, H. I.
    Steegers, E. A. P.
    de Koning, H. J.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 84 (02) : 265 - 270
  • [8] A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome
    Reid, Bernie
    Sinclair, Marlene
    Barr, Owen
    Dobbs, Frank
    Crealey, Grainne
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2009, 69 (11) : 1561 - 1573
  • [9] Understanding pregnant women's decision making concerning prenatal screening
    van den Berg, Matthijs
    Timmermans, Danielle R. M.
    Knol, Dirk L.
    de Smit, Denhard J.
    van Eijk, Jacques Th. M.
    van Vugt, John M. G.
    van der Wal, Gerrit
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 27 (04) : 430 - 437
  • [10] Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a survey of willingness in women and family physicians to engage in shared decision-making
    Legare, France
    St-Jacques, Sylvie
    Gagnon, Susie
    Njoya, Merlin
    Brisson, Michel
    Fremont, Pierre
    Rousseau, Francois
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (04) : 319 - 326