The impact of closing mechanism changes: evidence from the Shanghai stock market

被引:2
|
作者
Ma, Dan [1 ]
Wang, Chunfeng [1 ]
Fang, Zhenming [1 ]
Wang, Ziwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Closing mechanism; Call auction; Market quality; Investor behavior; Price manipulation; CALL AUCTIONS; TRADING MECHANISMS; PRICE EFFICIENCY; QUALITY; NASDAQ; CROSS;
D O I
10.1108/CFRI-04-2020-0041
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine the impact of closing mechanism changes on market quality, investor trading behavior and market manipulation in the Shanghai stock market. Design/methodology/approach A dummy variable is constructed indicating whether the closing mechanism is call auction or continuous auction. Market quality is measured from aspects of liquidity, volatility and price continuity; investor trading behavior is scaled by order timing and order aggressiveness, and a price deviation indicator is the proxy of manipulation. Using panel regression, this study examines the impact of closing mechanism changes based on intraday transaction data from the Shanghai stock market. Findings The conclusions are as follows: First, market quality improves after the closing mechanism is reformed in terms of liquidity, volatility and price continuity. Second, order strategy changes significantly in the closing call market, and investors trade more aggressively in the continuous trading period before closing. Third, the closing call mechanism restrains the closing price manipulation and thus prompts an efficient closing price. Originality/value This paper examines the policy effects of closing mechanism changes from aspects of market quality, trading behavior and price manipulation, providing pieces of evidence for trading mechanism design and market supervision in emerging markets.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 281
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of Institutional Investors on Stock Price Synchronicity: Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Market
    Kun, Li
    Yu, Lei
    Hu, Xiaoxue
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 1548 - 1558
  • [2] Is the efficiency of stock market correlated with multifractality? An evidence from the Shanghai stock market
    Gu, Rongbao
    Shao, Yanmin
    Wang, Qingnan
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2013, 392 (02) : 361 - 370
  • [3] Reexamining the impact of closing call auction on market quality: A natural experiment from the Shanghai stock exchange
    Han, Qian
    Zhao, Chengzhi
    Chen, Jing
    Guo, Qian
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2022, 74
  • [4] Overreaction effect: evidence from an emerging market (Shanghai stock market)
    Reddy, Krishna
    Qamar, Muhammad Ali Jibran
    Mirza, Nawazish
    Shi, Fangwei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2021, 17 (03) : 416 - 437
  • [5] Opening and closing the market: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange
    Ellul, A
    Shin, HS
    Tonks, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2005, 40 (04) : 779 - 801
  • [6] A closing call's impact on market quality: evidence from Abu Dhabi stock exchange
    Orhun, Eda
    [J]. PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2020, 32 (01) : 82 - 95
  • [7] COVID-19 and stock market nexus: evidence from Shanghai Stock Exchange
    Li, Chuanjian
    Su, Chi-Wei
    Altuntas, Mehmet
    Li, Xin
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 2351 - 2364
  • [8] STOCK MARKET OPENNESS AND MARKET QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM THE SHANGHAI-HONG KONG STOCK CONNECT PROGRAM
    Xu Ke
    Zheng Xinwei
    Pan Deng
    Xing Li
    Zhang Xuekui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH, 2020, 43 (02) : 373 - 406
  • [9] COVID-19 impact on stock market: Evidence from the Indian stock market
    Sahoo, Manamani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2021, 21 (04)
  • [10] Overreaction to policy changes in the housing market: Evidence from Shanghai
    Zhou, Zhengyi
    [J]. REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2016, 58 : 26 - 41