The Role of Monitoring Interpretive Rates, Concordance Between Cytotechnologist and Pathologist Interpretations Before Sign-Out, and Turnaround Time in Gynecologic Cytology Quality Assurance Findings From the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference Working Group 1

被引:15
|
作者
Clary, Karen M. [1 ]
Davey, Diane D. [2 ,3 ]
Naryshkin, Sonya [4 ]
Austin, R. Marshall [5 ]
Thomas, Nicole [6 ]
Chmara, Beth Anne [7 ]
Sugrue, Chiara [8 ]
Tworek, Joseph [9 ]
机构
[1] Rochester Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Rochester, NY 14621 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Clin Sci, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[3] Orlando Vet Adm Med Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
[4] Mercy Hlth Syst, Dept Pathol, Janesville, WI USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[6] Coll Amer Pathologists, CAP Pap Program, Northfield, IL USA
[7] Coll Amer Pathologists, Dept Cytol Surveys, Northfield, IL USA
[8] Hofstra Northshore Long Isl Jewish Sch Med, Div Cytopathol, New Hyde Pk, NY USA
[9] St Joseph Mercy Hosp, Dept Pathol, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
关键词
HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; CERVICAL CYTOLOGY; WOMEN; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; CELLS;
D O I
10.5858/arpa.2012-0120-CC
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Context.-The College of American Pathologists (CAP) conducted a national survey of gynecologic cytology quality assurance (QA) practices. Experts in gynecologic cytology were asked to join 5 working groups that studied the survey data on different aspects of QA. Evaluating the survey data and follow-up questions online, together with a review of pertinent literature, the working groups developed a series of preliminary statements on good laboratory practices in cytology QA. These were presented at a consensus conference and electronic voting occurred. Objective.-To evaluate a set of QA monitors in gynecologic cytology. Working group 1 evaluated (1) monitoring interpretive rate categories for Papanicolaou tests (Pap tests), (2) concordance of cytotechnologist and pathologist interpretations before sign-out, and (3) turnaround time for Pap tests. Data Sources.-The statements are based on a survey of gynecologic cytology QA practice patterns and of opinions from working group members and consensus conference attendees. Conclusions.-The outcomes of this process demonstrate the current state of practice patterns in gynecologic cytology QA. Monitoring interpretive rates for all Bethesda System categories is potentially useful, and it is most useful to monitor interpretive rates for cytotechnologists individually and in comparison to the entire laboratory. Laboratories need to determine what level of discrepancy between cytotechnologist and pathologist interpretations of Pap tests is important to track. Laboratories should consider formalizing procedures and policies to adjudicate such discrepant interpretations. Turnaround time should be monitored in gynecologic cytology, but individual laboratories should determine how to measure and use turnaround time internally.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 174
页数:11
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] General Quality Practices in Gynecologic Cytopathology Findings From the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference Working Group 3
    Tworek, Joseph
    Nayar, Ritu
    Savaloja, Lynnette
    Tabbara, Sana
    Thomas, Nicole
    Winkler, Barbara
    Howell, Lydia Pleotis
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 137 (02) : 190 - 198
  • [2] Prospective and Retrospective Review of Gynecologic Cytopathology Findings From the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference Working Group 2
    Brainard, Jennifer A.
    Birdsong, George G.
    Elsheikh, Tarik M.
    Hartley, David A.
    Naik, Kalyani
    Neal, Margaret H.
    Souers, Rhona J.
    Henry, Michael R.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 137 (02) : 175 - 182
  • [3] The Role of Proficiency Testing in Ensuring Quality Findings From the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference Working Group 3
    Howell, Lydia Pleotis
    Nayar, Ritu
    Savaloja, Lynnette
    Tabbara, Sana
    Thomas, Nicole
    Winkler, Barbara
    Tworek, Joseph
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 137 (02) : 183 - 189
  • [4] Monitoring and Ordering Practices for Human Papillomavirus in Cervical Cytology Findings From the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference Working Group 5
    Booth, Christine N.
    Bashleben, Christine
    Filomena, Carol A.
    Means, Marilee M.
    Wasserman, Patricia G.
    Souers, Rhona J.
    Henry, Michael R.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 137 (02) : 214 - 219
  • [5] Quality Improvement Opportunities in Gynecologic Cytologic-Histologic Correlations Findings From the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference Working Group 4
    Crothers, Barbara A.
    Jones, Bruce A.
    Cahill, Leigh Ann
    Moriarty, Ann T.
    Mody, Dina R.
    Tench, William D.
    Souers, Rhona J.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 137 (02) : 199 - 213