Delay-Rate-Distortion Optimized Rate Control for End-to-End Video Communication Over Wireless Channels

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Chenglin [1 ]
Xiong, Hongkai [1 ]
Wu, Dapeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Delay-rate-distortion optimization (dRDO); end-to-end distortion; rate control; wireless video; TRANSMISSION; MODEL; ALLOCATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/TCSVT.2015.2397232
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In addition to the rate-distortion (R-D) behavior, in a real-time wireless video communication system, the end-to-end delay would also significantly affect the overall video reception quality. To analyze, control, and optimize the R-D behavior under the end-to-end delay constraint, in this paper we extend the traditional R-D optimization (RDO) for the wireless video communication system and formulate a novel delay-RDO-based rate control problem, by investigating the allocation of end-to-end delay to different delay components. It aims at minimizing the average total end-to-end distortion under the transmission rate and end-to-end delay constraints, by a joint selection of both the source coding and the channel coding parameters. The wireless channel is represented by a finite-state Markov channel model characterizing the time-varying process and predicting the future channel condition. As applicable solutions, a practical algorithm based on the Lagrange multiplier approaches, Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions, and sequential quadratic programming methods is developed. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm over the existing schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:1665 / 1681
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DELAY-RATE-DISTORTION OPTIMIZED RATE CONTROL FOR WIRELESS VIDEO COMMUNICATION
    Li, Chenglin
    Xiong, Hongkai
    Wu, Dapeng Oliver
    [J]. 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2014, : 5996 - 6000
  • [2] End-to-end power-optimized video communication over wireless channels
    Ji, Z
    Zhang, Q
    Zhu, WW
    Zhang, YQ
    [J]. 2001 IEEE FOURTH WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2001, : 447 - 452
  • [3] Delay-Rate-Distortion Model for Real-Time Video Communication
    Chen, Qian
    Wu, Dapeng
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 25 (08) : 1376 - 1394
  • [4] End-to-end rate-distortion optimized motion estimation
    Wan, Shuai
    Izquierdo, Ebroul
    Yang, Fuzheng
    Chang, Yilin
    [J]. 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, ICIP 2006, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 809 - +
  • [5] End-to-end rate-distortion optimized mode selection for multiple description video coding
    Heng, BA
    Apostolopoulos, JG
    Lim, AS
    [J]. 2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1-5: SPEECH PROCESSING, 2005, : 905 - 908
  • [6] End-to-End Distortion Optimized Error Control for Real-time Wireless Video Streaming
    Peng, Guangchao
    Liu, Yanwei
    Hu, Yahui
    Ci, Song
    Tang, Hui
    [J]. 2011 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING (MMSP), 2011,
  • [7] End-to-end rate-distortion optimized MD mode selection for multiple description video coding
    Heng, Brian A.
    Apostolopoulos, John G.
    Lim, Jae S.
    [J]. EURASIP JOURNAL ON APPLIED SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2006, 2006 (1) : 1 - 12
  • [8] End-to-End Rate-Distortion Optimized MD Mode Selection for Multiple Description Video Coding
    Brian A Heng
    John G Apostolopoulos
    Jae S Lim
    [J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2006
  • [9] Error-resilient video coding with end-to-end rate-distortion optimized at macroblock level
    Jimin Xiao
    Tammam Tillo
    Chunyu Lin
    Yao Zhao
    [J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2011
  • [10] End-to-End Rate-Distortion Optimized Learned Hierarchical Bi-Directional Video Compression
    Yilmaz, M. Akin
    Tekalp, A. Murat
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2022, 31 : 974 - 983