Are all trade protection policies created equal? Empirical evidence for nonequivalent market power effects of tariffs and quotas

被引:8
|
作者
Blonigen, Bruce A. [1 ,2 ]
Liebman, Benjamin H. [3 ]
Pierce, Justin R. [4 ]
Wilson, Wesley W. [1 ]
机构
[1] 1285 Univ Oregon, Dept Econ, Eugene, OR 97401 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] St Josephs Univ, Dept Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19131 USA
[4] Fed Reserve Syst, Board Governors, Washington, DC 20551 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Market structure; Nonequivalence of tariffs and quotas; VRAs; Antidumping; Mini-mills; STEEL; PRICE; PRODUCTIVITY; LAW; RESTRICTIONS; PANEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.08.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Over the past 50 years, the steel industry has been protected by a wide variety of trade policies, both tariff- and quota-based. We exploit this extensive heterogeneity in trade protection to examine the well- established theoretical literature predicting nonequivalent effects of tariffs and quotas on domestic firms' market power. Using plant-level Census Bureau data for steel plants from 1967 to 2002, we find evidence for significant market power effects for binding quota-based protection, but not tariff-based protection, particularly with respect to integrated and minimill steel producers. Our results are robust to calculation with two standard measures of market power and controlling for potential endogeneity of trade policies. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 378
页数:10
相关论文
共 7 条