COMPARISON OF HIGH AND LOW DENSITY AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA FOR FOREST ROAD QUALITY ASSESSMENT

被引:9
|
作者
Kiss, K. [1 ]
Malinen, J. [1 ]
Tokola, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Sch Forest Sci, Fac Sci & Forestry, POB 111 Yliopistokatu 7, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
来源
关键词
forest road; road quality; forestry; LiDAR; ALS; WATER-QUALITY;
D O I
10.5194/isprsannals-III-8-167-2016
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Good quality forest roads are important for forest management. Airborne laser scanning data can help create automatized road quality detection, thus avoiding field visits. Two different pulse density datasets have been used to assess road quality: high-density airborne laser scanning data from Kiihtelysvaara and low-density data from Tuusniemi, Finland. The field inventory mainly focused on the surface wear condition, structural condition, flatness, road side vegetation and drying of the road. Observations were divided into poor, satisfactory and good categories based on the current Finnish quality standards used for forest roads. Digital Elevation Models were derived from the laser point cloud, and indices were calculated to determine road quality. The calculated indices assessed the topographic differences on the road surface and road sides. The topographic position index works well in flat terrain only, while the standardized elevation index described the road surface better if the differences are bigger. Both indices require at least a 1 metre resolution. High-density data is necessary for analysis of the road surface, and the indices relate mostly to the surface wear and flatness. The classification was more precise (31-92%) than on low-density data (25-40%). However, ditch detection and classification can be carried out using the sparse dataset as well (with a success rate of 69%). The use of airborne laser scanning data can provide quality information on forest roads.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 172
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimating Stand Density in a Tropical Broadleaf Forest Using Airborne LiDAR Data
    Lee, Chung-Cheng
    Wang, Chi-Kuei
    FORESTS, 2018, 9 (08)
  • [2] Automatic road extraction for airborne LiDAR data
    Wang Yuan
    Chen Si-ying
    Zhang Yin-chao
    Chen He
    Guo Pan
    Yang Jian
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PHOTOELECTRONIC DETECTION AND IMAGING 2013: LASER SENSING AND IMAGING AND APPLICATIONS, 2013, 8905
  • [3] Forest Delineation Based on Airborne LIDAR Data
    Eysn, Lothar
    Hollaus, Markus
    Schadauer, Klemens
    Pfeifer, Norbert
    REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 4 (03) : 762 - 783
  • [4] USING AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA FOR ASSESSMENT OF FOREST FIRE FUEL LOAD POTENTIAL
    Inan, M.
    Bilici, E.
    Akay, A. E.
    4TH INTERNATIONAL GEOADVANCES WORKSHOP - GEOADVANCES 2017: ISPRS WORKSHOP ON MULTI-DIMENSIONAL & MULTI-SCALE SPATIAL DATA MODELING, 2017, 4-4 (W4): : 255 - 258
  • [5] Quality Assessment of Building Roof Segmentation from Airborne LIDAR Data
    Li, Jing
    Xiao, Yong
    Wang, Cheng
    2013 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOINFORMATICS (GEOINFORMATICS), 2013,
  • [6] FOREST CANOPY LEAF AREA DENSITY ESTIMATION BASED ON AIRBORNE AND TERRESTRIAL LIDAR DATA
    Dai, Leiyu
    Li, Shihua
    Zhao, Yankai
    Lin, Sen
    He, Ze
    IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 3238 - 3241
  • [7] Forest Road Detection Using LiDAR Data
    Zahra Azizi
    Akbar Najafi
    Saeed Sadeghian
    Journal of Forestry Research, 2014, 25 : 975 - 980
  • [8] Forest Road Detection Using LiDAR Data
    Zahra Azizi
    Akbar Najafi
    Saeed Sadeghian
    Journal of Forestry Research, 2014, 25 (04) : 975 - 980
  • [9] Forest Road Detection Using LiDAR Data
    Azizi, Zahra
    Najafi, Akbar
    Sadeghian, Saeed
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (04) : 975 - 980
  • [10] Assessment by independent validation of the predictions of forest parameters made from airborne LiDAR data
    Munoz, Alain
    Bock, Jérôme
    Monnet, Jean-Matthieu
    Renaud, Jean Pierre
    Jolly, Anne
    Riond, Catherine
    Revue Francaise de Photogrammetrie et de Teledetection, 2015, (211-212): : 81 - 92