The Spatial Differentiation and Driving Forces of Ecological Welfare Performance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

被引:7
|
作者
Bai, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Tianran [1 ]
Xu, Wei [2 ]
Luo, Kang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Lethbridge, Dept Geog & Environm, 4401 Univ Dr West, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecological welfare performance; spatial differentiation; spatial convergence; Yangtze River Economic Belt; CARBON INTENSITY; EFFICIENCY; TRADE; PERSPECTIVE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph192214801
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecological welfare performance contributes directly to human well-being and regional sustainable development. Improving the regional ecological welfare performance in the process of pursuing green and sustainable development demands theoretical innovation and empirical exploration. Based on the super-efficiency SBM model, this study evaluated the ecological welfare performance of 108 cities during the period of 2009 to 2019. The Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition and spatial convergence model were employed to analyze the differences in ecological welfare performance across and within the study area and explore the underlining causes of such spatial differentiation in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and the upper, middle and lower reaches. It can be seen from the results that: (1) the overall difference in the ecological welfare performance of the Yangtze River Economic Belt is associated with a fluctuating downward trend during the study period. Regional and inter-regional differences were revealed and hypervariable density was identified as the main source of the differences. (2) The ecological welfare performance of the Yangtze River Economic Belt has absolute and conditional beta convergence, and the ecological welfare performance of each city-region and surrounding urban areas has a positive impact on each other. (3) The difference in the spatial-temporal differentiation trend is manifested by the difference in the convergence rate. The cities in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River have the fastest convergence rate, followed by the cities in the upper reaches, and the cities in the lower reaches are the slowest. This geographic difference is mainly driven by the combined effects of industrial structure, urban characteristics, environmental regulation, foreign direct investment, and transportation accessibility. Finally, it is proposed that future policies should focus on the imbalanced regional development in the study area, and each region needs to explore ways to improve local ecological welfare performance according to local conditions, and ultimately promote the overall green, coordinated and high-quality development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial characteristics and driving forces of anthropogenic phosphorus emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Liu, Dandan
    Bai, Lu
    Li, Xueying
    Zhang, Yue
    Qiao, Qi
    Lu, Zhibo
    Liu, Jingyang
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 176
  • [2] Can New Urbanization Construction Improve Ecological Welfare Performance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt?
    Bao, Lingyan
    Ding, Xuhui
    Zhang, Jingxian
    Ma, Dingyi
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [3] Spatial effects on emission reduction of water pollutants and its driving forces in Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Zhou, Kan
    Wu, Jian-Xiong
    Qian, Zhe-Dong
    Fan, Jie
    Wang, Qiang
    [J]. Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2020, 40 (02): : 885 - 895
  • [4] Spatial distribution characteristics and variability of urban ecological welfare performance in the Yangtze River economic Belt: Evidence from 70 cities
    Yang, Jie
    Li, Zhigang
    Zhang, Dong
    Yu, Keyao
    Zhong, Jialong
    Zhu, Jiaxing
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 160
  • [5] Spatial-Temporal Differentiation and the Driving Mechanism of Rural Transformation Development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Zhang, Rongtian
    Zhang, Xiaolin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [6] Improving Urban Ecological Welfare Performance: An ST-LMDI Approach to the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Yang, Jie
    Li, Zhigang
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [7] Changes and Driving Forces of Urban-Agricultural-Ecological Space in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2020
    Xia, Junnan
    Hong, Mengyao
    Wei, Wei
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (05)
  • [8] Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving forces of construction land expansion in Yangtze River economic belt, China
    Cai, Wenjie
    Tu Fangyuan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [9] Driving Forces of Tourism Carbon Decoupling: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Tang, Qunli
    Wang, Qianqian
    Zhou, Tiancai
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (14)
  • [10] Spatial temporal patterns and driving factors of industrial pollution and structures in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Wang, Yazhu
    Duan, Xuejun
    Wang, Lingqing
    Zou, Hui
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 303