Patient survival and therapeutic outcome in the UK bridge to transplant left ventricular assist device population

被引:13
|
作者
Parameshwar, Jayan [1 ]
Hogg, Rachel [2 ]
Rushton, Sally [2 ]
Taylor, Rhiannon [2 ]
Shaw, Steven [3 ]
Mehew, Jenny [2 ]
Simon, Andre [4 ]
MacGowan, Guy A. [5 ]
Dalzell, Jonathan R. [6 ]
Al Attar, Nawwar [6 ]
Venkateswaran, Rajamiyer [3 ]
Lim, Hoong Sern [7 ]
Schueler, Stephan [5 ]
Tsui, Steven [1 ]
Banner, Nicholas Robert [4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Papworth Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Cambridge CB23 3RE, England
[2] NHS Blood & Transplant, Stat & Clin Studies, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Manchester Univ Fdn Trust, Wythenshaw Hosp, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Fdn Trust, Harefield, Middx, England
[5] Newcastle Upon Tyne Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Freeman Hosp, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[6] Golden Jubilee Natl Hosp, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[7] Univ Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
advanced heart failure therapies (LV assist devices; total artificial heart); heart transplantation; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; ADVANCED HEART-FAILURE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TASK-FORCE; PUMP; SOCIETY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313355
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To study the survival and patient outcome in a population of UK patients supported by an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation. Methods Data on all adult patients (n=342) who received a HeartMate II or HVAD as a first long-term LVAD between January 2007 and 31 December 2013 were extracted from the UK Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) Database in November 2015. Outcomes analysed include survival on a LVAD, time to urgent listing, heart transplantation and complications including those needing a pump exchange. Results 112 patients were supported with the Thoratec HeartMate II and 230 were supported with the HeartWare HVAD. Median duration of support was 534 days. During the study period, 81 patients required moving to the UK urgent waiting list for heart transplantation. Of the 342 patients, 85 (24.8%) received a heart transplant, this included 63 on the urgent list. Thirty-day survival was 88.9%, while overall patient survival at 3 years from LVAD implant was 49.6%. 156 patients (46%) died during LVAD support; the most common cause of death on a VAD was a cerebrovascular accident. There was no significant difference between the two devices used in any outcome. Conclusions In a population of patients with advanced heart failure, who have a very poor prognosis, support with an implantable LVAD allowed a quarter to receive a heart transplant in a 3-year period. Overall survival of the cohort was about 50%. With improvement in technology and in post-LVAD management, it is likely that outcomes will improve further.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 296
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient Survival and Therapeutic Outcomes in the UK Bridge to Heart Transplant Ventricular Assist Device Population
    Rushton, S.
    Hogg, R.
    Banner, N.
    Simon, A.
    Venkateswaran, R.
    Shaw, S.
    Al-Attar, N.
    Dalzell, J.
    Schueler, S.
    MacGowan, G.
    Mascaro, J.
    Sern, L.
    Tsui, S.
    Parameshwar, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (04): : S267 - S268
  • [2] Impact of risk factors on patient survival with left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to orthotopic heart transplant
    Tumilty, BL
    Malinowska, K
    Pisani, BA
    Mendez, JC
    Lichtenberg, RC
    Robinson, JA
    Foy, BK
    Bakhos, M
    Mullen, GM
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEART FAILURE, 2002, : 491 - 496
  • [3] Survival and Functional Status After Bridge-to-Transplant with a Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Suarez-Pierre, Alejandro
    Zhou, Xun
    Fraser, Charles D., III
    Grimm, Joshua C.
    Crawford, Todd C.
    Lui, Cecillia
    Valero, Vicente
    Choi, Chun W.
    Higgins, Robert S.
    Kilic, Ahmet
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2019, 65 (07) : 661 - 667
  • [4] Panel Reactive Antibody in Bridge to Transplant Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: Impact on Patient Survival after Cardiac Transplant
    Trivedi, J. R.
    Slaughter, M. S.
    McCants, K. C.
    Birks, E. J.
    Meyer, A.
    Williams, M. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 31 (04): : S93 - S93
  • [5] Left ventricular assist device: a bridge to transplant or destination therapy?
    Patel, Swati
    Nicholson, Louise
    Cassidy, Christopher J.
    Wong, Kenneth Y-K
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 92 (1087) : 271 - 281
  • [6] Survival on the Heart Transplant Waiting List: Impact of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device as Bridge to Transplant
    Trivedi, Jaimin R.
    Cheng, Allen
    Singh, Ramesh
    Williams, Matthew L.
    Slaughter, Mark S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 98 (03): : 830 - 834
  • [7] Left ventricular assist device as a bridge to patient and myocardial recovery
    Jaski, BE
    Lingle, RJ
    Reardon, LC
    Dembitsky, WP
    [J]. PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2000, 43 (01) : 5 - 18
  • [8] Successful Bridge to Transplant Using the TandemHeart (R) Left Ventricular Assist Device in a Pediatric Patient
    Russell, Hyde M.
    Kulat, Bradley
    Zingle, Neale
    Backer, Carl L.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL FOR PEDIATRIC AND CONGENITAL HEART SURGERY, 2012, 3 (02) : 249 - 250
  • [9] The HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device as a strategy to bridge to transplant
    Kilcoyne, Maxwell F.
    Huckaby, Lauren, V
    Hashmi, Zubair
    Witer, Lucas
    Pope, Nicolas
    Houston, Brian A.
    Inampudi, Chakradhari
    Tedford, Ryan J.
    Kilic, Arman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (12) : 4713 - 4718
  • [10] Survival after Implant of a Left Ventricular Assist Device: Is It the Device or Is It the Patient?
    Rogers, J. G.
    Pagani, F. D.
    Kirklin, J. K.
    Naftel, D. C.
    Morris, R. J.
    Dembitsky, W. P.
    Blood, M. S.
    Young, J. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 29 (02): : S40 - S40