Defect Management of EUV mask

被引:2
|
作者
Kamo, Takashi [1 ]
Murano, Koji [1 ]
Takai, Kosuke [1 ]
Hagihara, Kazuki [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Shinji [1 ]
Naka, Masato [1 ]
Morishita, Keiko [1 ]
Yoshikawa, Ryoji [1 ]
Itoh, Masamitsu [1 ]
Kyoh, Suigen [2 ]
Hayashi, Naoya [3 ]
机构
[1] Toshiba Co Ltd, Corp Res & Dev Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Toshiba Co Ltd, Adv Memory Dev Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Dai Nippon Printing Co Ltd, Elect Device Operat, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
EUV lithography; mask; blank defect; multilayer; printability;
D O I
10.1117/12.978976
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography (EUVL) is a promising technology for the fabrication of ULSI devices with 20nm half-pitch node. One of the key challenges before EUVL is to achieve defect-free masks. There are three main categories of mask defects: multilayer defects which cause phase defects, absorber pattern defects, and particles during blank/mask fabrication or mask handling after mask fabrication. It is important to manage multilayer defect because small multilayer defects are difficult to be identified by SEM/AFM after mask patterning and can impact wafer printing. In this paper, we assess blank defect position error detected by 3rd generation blank inspection tool, using blank defect information from blank supplier and 199nm wavelength patterned mask inspection tool NPI-7000. And we rank blank defect in the order of projection defect size to multilayer in order to estimate blank defect printability. This method avoids overestimating the number of potential killer defects that hardly be identified by SEM/AFM under the condition that EUV-AIMS is not available.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EUV mask pattern defect printability
    Liang, Ted
    Zhang, Guojing
    Naulleau, Patrick
    Myers, Alan
    Park, Seh-Jin
    Stivers, Alan
    Vandentop, Gilroy
    [J]. PHOTOMASK AND NEXT GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6283
  • [2] EUV mask defect analysis from mask to wafer printing
    Hyun, Yoonsuk
    Seo, Kangjoon
    Kim, Kyuyoung
    Lee, Inwhan
    Lee, Byounghoon
    Koo, Sunyoung
    Lee, Jongsu
    Kim, Sukkyun
    Kim, Seomin
    Kim, Myoungsoo
    Kang, Hyosang
    [J]. EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY IV, 2013, 8679
  • [3] Investigation of EUV haze defect: Molecular behaviors of mask cleaning chemicals on EUV mask surfaces
    Choi, Jaehyuck
    Novak, Steve
    Kandel, Yudhishthir
    Denbeaux, Greg
    Lee, Han-shin
    Ma, Andy
    Goodwin, Frank
    [J]. EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY III, 2012, 8322
  • [4] Screening EUV mask absorbers for defect repaird
    Isogawa, Takeshi
    Seki, Kazunori
    Lawliss, Mark
    Gallagher, Emily
    Akima, Shinji
    Konishi, Toshio
    [J]. PHOTOMASK AND NEXT-GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XXI, 2014, 9256
  • [5] EUV pellicle development for mask defect control
    Shroff, Yashesh A.
    Goldstein, Michael
    Rice, Bryan
    Lee, Sang H.
    Ravi, K. V.
    Tanzil, Daniel
    [J]. EMERGING LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES X, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6151
  • [6] Evaluation of non-actinic EUV mask inspection and defect printability on multiple EUV mask absorbers
    Badger, Karen
    Gallagher, Emily
    Seki, Kazunori
    McIntyre, Gregory
    Konishi, Toshio
    Kodera, Yutaka
    Redding, Vincent
    [J]. PHOTOMASK AND NEXT-GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XX, 2013, 8701
  • [7] EUV Mask Defect Inspection and Defect Review Strategies for EUV Pilot Line and High Volume Manufacturing
    Chan, Y. David
    Rastegar, Abbas
    Yun, Henry
    Putna, E. Steve
    Wurm, Stefan
    [J]. EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY, 2010, 7636
  • [8] EUV mask defect mitigation through pattern placement
    Burns, John
    Abbas, Mansoor
    [J]. PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2010, 2010, 7823
  • [9] EUV mask blank defect avoidance solutions assessment
    Elayat, Ahmad
    Thwaite, Peter
    Schulze, Steffen
    [J]. PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2012, 2012, 8522
  • [10] EUV mask contact layer defect printability and requirement
    Yan, PY
    Lai, CW
    Cardinale, G
    [J]. EMERGING LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES IV, 2000, 3997 : 508 - 514