Helicopter Emergency Medical Services save lives: outcome in a cohort of 1073 polytraumatized patients

被引:29
|
作者
Giannakopoulos, Georgios F. [1 ]
Kolodzinskyi, Mischka N. [1 ]
Christiaans, Herman M. T. [2 ]
Boer, Christa [2 ]
de lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M. [3 ]
Zuidema, Wietse P. [1 ]
Bloemers, Frank W. [1 ]
Bakker, Fred C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Trauma Surg, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Helicopter Emergency Medical Services; polytrauma; survival; triage; THORACOSTOMY; SURVIVAL; TEAM; LIFE; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328352ac9b
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background In many Western countries, Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) have become standard in the prehospital care of severely injured patients. Several studies have shown that HEMS have a positive effect on patient's outcome, although it remains unclear which specific patients benefit most from its care. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of HEMS on the outcome of a large polytraumatized (Injury Severity Score >= 16) population. Methods All polytraumatized patients treated at the scene of the accident by EMS and/or HEMS and presented in the VU University Medical Center during a period of 6 years were included and retrospectively analyzed. The total population was divided into two groups according to the presence of HEMS on-scene. Prehospital, in-hospital, and outcome parameters were compared. The Trauma Injury Severity Score method was used to calculate the probability of survival. Results Almost 60% of all included patients (n = 1073) were treated only by an EMS crew on-scene. The remaining 446 patients received additional HEMS care. Significant differences between these two groups were observed in the demographic characteristics, showing that the HEMS group was more severely injured. The predicted survival was calculated using the Trauma Injury Severity Score method, as well as the observed survival, both showing a significantly higher outcome for the EMS group (0.88 vs. 0.66% and 87.7 vs. 71.3%). However, the Z-statistic showed a significant positive difference between the predicted and the observed survival for the HEMS group (P < 0.005) and no significant differences for the EMS group (P > 0.1), indicating that the chance of surviving in the HEMS group was higher. Per 100 HEMS dispatches, 5.4 additional lives were saved. A correlation of the observed survival with the first measured Revised Trauma Score on-scene showed a positive effect for the HEMS group when the Revised Trauma Score reached a value of 9 or lower. Conclusion On-scene HEMS care has a positive effect on the survival of polytraumatized patients, saving 5.4 additional lives per 100 HEMS deployments. This positive effect is especially observed in patients with abnormal vital signs (respiratory and hemodynamically). Research and revision of dispatch criteria are important to reach patients that benefit most from HEMS care. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 20:79-85 (c) 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 85
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Willingness to Pay for Lives Saved by Helicopter Emergency Medical Services
    Ringburg, Akkie N.
    Buljac, Martina
    Stolk, Elly A.
    van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
    van Beeck, Ed F.
    Patka, Peter
    Schipper, Inger B.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2009, 13 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [2] Helicopter Emergency Medical Services in East Azerbaijan province: Assessment of patients' outcome
    Ghaffarzad, Amir
    Ghalandarzadeh, Amin
    Rahmani, Farzad
    Ghafouri, Rouzbeh Rajaei
    Dorosti, Fatemeh
    Morteza-Bagi, Hamid Reza
    [J]. ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2021, 27 (04): : 427 - 433
  • [3] Helicopter emergency medical services
    Nocera, A
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 : S2 - S2
  • [4] Helicopter emergency medical services for patients with cerebral stroke
    Timler, Dariusz
    Galazkowski, Robert
    Bogusiak, Katarzyna
    Kasielska-Trojan, Anna
    [J]. EMERGENCIAS, 2015, 27 (03): : 193 - 196
  • [5] Survival benefit of helicopter emergency medical services compared to ground emergency medical services in traumatized patients
    Andruszkow, Hagen
    Lefering, Rolf
    Frink, Michael
    Mommsen, Philipp
    Zeckey, Christian
    Rahe, Katharina
    Krettek, Christian
    Hildebrand, Frank
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 17 (03):
  • [6] Survival benefit of helicopter emergency medical services compared to ground emergency medical services in traumatized patients
    Hagen Andruszkow
    Rolf Lefering
    Michael Frink
    Philipp Mommsen
    Christian Zeckey
    Katharina Rahe
    Christian Krettek
    Frank Hildebrand
    [J]. Critical Care, 17
  • [7] Bispectral Index Monitoring in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Patients
    Heegaard, William
    Fringer, Ryan Charles
    Frascone, R. J.
    Pippert, Greg
    Miner, James
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2009, 13 (02) : 193 - 197
  • [8] Save Lives: A Review of Ambulance Technologies in Pre-Hospital Emergency Medical Services
    Pulsiri, Nonthapat
    Vatananan-Thesenvitz, Ronald
    Sirisamutr, Teera
    Wachiradilok, Porntip
    [J]. 2019 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (PICMET), 2019,
  • [9] Mobile Ultrasound in the Rescue Helicopter: Emergency Sonography can save Lives
    不详
    [J]. NOTARZT, 2017, 33 (04):
  • [10] Comparative effectiveness of helicopter emergency medical services compared to ground emergency medical services
    Galvagno, Samuel M., Jr.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 17 (04):