Why do women go along with this stuff?

被引:25
|
作者
Kitzinger, S
Green, JM
Chalmers, B
Keirse, MJNC
Lindstrom, K
Hemminki, E
机构
[1] Univ York, Mother & Infant Res Unit, Dept Hlth Sci, Area 4, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Community Hlth, Kingston, ON K7L 5P5, Canada
[3] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynaecol & Reprod Med, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
[4] Hlth & Social Serv, Natl Res & Dev Ctr Welf & Hlth, STAKES, Helsinki 00531, Finland
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2006年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00094.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Normal childbirth has become jeopardized by inexorably rising interventions around the world. In many countries and settings, cesarean surgery, labor induction, and epidural analgesia continue to increase beyond all precedent, and without convincing evidence that these actions result in improved outcomes (1,2). Use of electronic fetal monitoring is endemic, despite evidence of its ineffectiveness and consequences for most parturients (1,3); ultrasound examinations are too often done unnecessarily, redundantly, or for frivolous rather than indicated reasons (4); episiotomies are still routine in many settings despite clear evidence that this surgery results in more harm than good (5); and medical procedures, unphysiological positions, pubic shaving and enemas, intravenous lines, enforced fasting, drugs, and early mother-infant separation are used unnecessarily (1). Clinicians write and talk about the ideal of evidence-based obstetrics, but do not practice it consistently, if at all. Why do women go along with this stuff? In this Roundtable Discussion, Part 1, we asked some maternity care professionals and advocates to discuss this question.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 158
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条