Personalized medicine as orphanization: legal and ethical questions

被引:0
|
作者
Gottwald, Sina [1 ]
Huster, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Sozial & Gesundheitsrecht, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
关键词
AMNOG; Orphan drugs; Statutory health insurance; Benefit assessment; Personalized medicine;
D O I
10.1007/s00481-013-0265-5
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Definition of the problem The development of personalized medicine is currently a popular topic. Particularly the personalized pharmacotherapy is a matter of relative importance due to pharmacological and molecular-genetic developments. For this reason it is required to examine the implications of personalized pharmacotherapy to statutory health insurance and health care of patients. Arguments In this context the question of orphanization arises: If medical drugs of personalized medicine could be regularly indicated as orphan drugs, i.e., as drugs to medicate orphan diseases, it would not be necessary according to the "Arzneimittelneuordnungsgesetz" (AMNOG) to prove an auxiliary value within the assessment of the "Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss" (GBA). Crucial to the drug's indication as an orphan drug is among other things the rate of prevalence of the patient group, whose disease should be medicated with the drug. In this connection, there is importance attached to the stratification of patient groups within personalized medicine. Conclusion An orphanization causes consequences in terms of prices to the statutory health insurance due to the lack of knowledge about an auxiliary value. For patients, the implications must be considered in a more differentiated manner.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Personalisierte Medizin als Orphanisierung: rechtliche und ethische FragenPersonalized medicine as orphanization: legal and ethical questions
    Sina Gottwald
    Stefan Huster
    [J]. Ethik in der Medizin, 2013, 25 (3) : 259 - 266
  • [2] Legal and ethical concerns in personalized medicine: a European perspective
    Regniault, Alexandre
    Kupecz, Andras
    Gavey, Michael
    Mignolet, Olivier
    De Carlo, Paolo
    Meyer, Peter
    Bailey, Sarah
    [J]. PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2009, 6 (05) : 517 - 528
  • [3] ETHICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS POSED BY RECENT ADVANCES IN MEDICINE
    APPEL, JZ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1968, 205 (07): : 513 - &
  • [4] Personalized Medicine. Medical, ethical, legal, and economic Analysis
    Schildmann, Jan
    Marckmann, Georg
    Vollmann, Jochen
    [J]. ETHIK IN DER MEDIZIN, 2013, 25 (03) : 169 - 172
  • [5] Ethical, legal and social implications of incorporating personalized medicine into healthcare
    Brothers, Kyle B.
    Rothstein, Mark A.
    [J]. PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2015, 12 (01) : 43 - 51
  • [6] Personalized Medicine in a New Genomic Era: Ethical and Legal Aspects
    Maria Shoaib
    Mansoor Ali Merchant Rameez
    Syed Ather Hussain
    Mohammed Madadin
    Ritesh G. Menezes
    [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2017, 23 : 1207 - 1212
  • [7] Personalized Medicine in a New Genomic Era: Ethical and Legal Aspects
    Shoaib, Maria
    Rameez, Mansoor Ali Merchant
    Hussain, Syed Ather
    Madadin, Mohammed
    Menezes, Ritesh G.
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2017, 23 (04) : 1207 - 1212
  • [8] MEDICAL-LEGAL AND ETHICAL QUESTIONS IN PALLIATIVE MEDICINE AND EUTHANASIA
    PRIBILLA, O
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 69 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [9] Seven Questions for Personalized Medicine
    Joyner, Michael J.
    Paneth, Nigel
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (10): : 999 - 1000
  • [10] The ethical framing of personalized medicine
    Joly, Yann
    Saulnier, Katie M.
    Osien, Gladys
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 14 (05) : 404 - 408