Corrosion of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices

被引:9
|
作者
Knutson, Kevin J. [1 ]
Berzins, David W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Marquette Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Dev Sci Orthodont, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Marquette Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Gen Dent Sci Dent Biomat, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
关键词
COMMERCIALLY PURE TITANIUM; MINI-IMPLANTS; MINISCREW IMPLANTS; DENTAL ALLOYS; TORSIONAL PROPERTIES; ARTIFICIAL SALIVA; RESISTANCE; BEHAVIOR; FATIGUE; MOUTHWASHES;
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cjs027
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Corrosion of orthodontic miniscrews or temporary anchorage devices (TADs) has been proposed as a contributor to inflammation, which in turn is a factor in the clinical success of miniscrews. The purpose of this study was to measure the electrochemical properties of orthodontic miniscrews in artificial saliva with and without fluoride. The corrosion properties of three miniscrew products (VectorTAS, Ormco Corp.; Unitek TAD, 3M Unitek; and Through-Hole Screw, American Orthodontics) were tested in an artificial saliva (Fusayama-Meyer) with (1500 ppm) or without fluoride (n = 10/product/solution). Open circuit potential (OCP), polarization resistance (R-p), and corrosion current (I-corr) were measured and statistically analysed with the Friedman/Tukey least significant difference tests. No significant differences (P > 0.05) between miniscrews with regard to OCP, R-p, and I-corr were found except that the American Orthodontics miniscrews had a significantly (P < 0.05) more noble OCP compared to the others. Incorporation of 1500 ppm fluoride in the artificial saliva significantly (P < 0.001) lowered the OCP, reduced the polarization resistance, and increased the corrosion current of each miniscrew product. Few differences existed in the electrochemical properties of miniscrews from the three different manufacturers; however, exposure to fluoride was detrimental to the corrosion properties of all miniscrews.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 506
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experience with orthodontic temporary anchorage devices
    Marc Schätzle
    [J]. Head & Face Medicine, 10 (Suppl 1)
  • [2] Changing orthodontic mechanics with Temporary Anchorage Devices
    Krishnan, Vinod
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2024, 13 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [3] Temporary orthodontic anchorage devices for improving occlusion
    Rossouw, P. E.
    Buschang, P. H.
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2009, 12 (03) : 195 - 205
  • [4] Acceptance of orthodontic miniscrews as temporary anchorage devices
    Zawawi, Khalid H.
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2014, 8 : 933 - 937
  • [5] Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary skeletal anchorage devices effective?
    Fudalej, Piotr
    Antoszewska, Joanna
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (06) : 722 - 729
  • [6] Factors affecting the clinical success of orthodontic anchorage: Experience with 266 temporary anchorage devices
    Lai, Tai-Ting
    Chen, Min-Huey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2014, 9 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [7] Stability of miniplates and miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage: experience with 492 temporary anchorage devices
    Chen, Yi-Jane
    Chang, Hao-Hueng
    Lin, Hsing-Yi
    Lai, Eddie Hsian-Hua
    Hung, Hsin-Chia
    Yao, Chung-Chen Jane
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (11) : 1188 - 1196
  • [8] The effectiveness of Oraqix versus TAC(a) for placement of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices
    Kwong, Thomas S.
    Kusnoto, Budi
    Viana, Grace
    Evans, Carla A.
    Watanabe, Keiko
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (05) : 754 - 759
  • [9] Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review
    Hoste, Sofie
    Vercruyssen, Marjolein
    Quirynen, Marc
    Willems, Guy
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN ORTHODONTIC JOURNAL, 2008, 24 (02) : 140 - 148
  • [10] Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review
    Schaetzle, Marc
    Maennchen, Roland
    Zwahlen, Marcel
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (12) : 1351 - 1359