Right ventricular failure after implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist device: analysis of predictors and outcomes

被引:21
|
作者
Lo, Casey [1 ,2 ]
Murphy, Deirdre [3 ]
Summerhayes, Robyn [1 ]
Quayle, Margaret [1 ]
Burrell, Aiden [3 ]
Bailey, Michael [4 ]
Marasco, Silvana F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Prahran, Vic 3181, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Alfred, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Alfred Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Prahran, Vic 3181, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Preventat Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
left ventricular assist device; right ventricular failure; transplantation; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; RIGHT HEART; RISK SCORE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; CANDIDATES;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.12577
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Postoperative right ventricular failure is a serious complication for up to 50% of patients following LVAD insertion. Predicting RV failure is an important factor for patients as planned BiVAD support has been shown to correlate with better outcomes compared to delayed BiVAD to LVAD conversion. This retrospective study examined prospectively collected data for 101 patients implanted with an LVAD between 2003 and 2013, aiming to establish preoperative predictive factors for RVF post-LVAD insertion, analyze outcomes, and validate existing RVF scoring systems. In our cohort, 63 patients (62.4%) developed RV failure and consequently demonstrated consistently poorer survival throughout the follow-up period (log-rank p=0.01). Multivariable logistic regression identified two significant variables: cardiac index <2.2 preoperatively despite inotropic support (OR 4.6 [95%CI 1.8-11.8]; p=0.001) and preoperative tricuspid regurgitation (OR 8.1 [95%CI 1.9-34]; p=0.004). Patients who developed RV failure had more complicated postoperative courses including longer ICU stay (p<0.001), higher incidence of transfusions (p=0.03) and re-intubation (p=0.001), longer ventilation duration (p<0.001), and higher incidence of returning to theater (p=0.0008). This study found that previous validation models had only moderate correlation with our population emphasizing the need for prospective validation of these scores in the current era of continuous flow devices.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 770
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preoperative predictors and outcomes of right ventricular assist device implantation after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation
    Patil, Nikhil Prakash
    Mohite, Prashant N.
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Dhar, Dhruva
    Weymann, Alexander
    Zeriouh, Mohamed
    Hards, Rachel
    Hedger, Michael
    De Robertis, Fabio
    Bahrami, Toufan
    Amrani, Mohamed
    Rahman-Haley, Shelley
    Banner, Nicholas R.
    Popov, Aron Frederik
    Simon, Andre Ruediger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 150 (06): : 1651 - 1658
  • [2] Predictors of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Koprivanac, Marijan
    Kelava, Marta
    Siric, Franjo
    Cruz, Vincent B.
    Moazami, Nader
    Mihaljevic, Tomislav
    [J]. CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (06) : 587 - 595
  • [3] Prediction of right ventricular failure after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation
    Sert, Dogan Emre
    Karahan, Mehmet
    Aygun, Emre
    Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit
    Akdi, Mustafa
    Kervan, Umit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (11) : 2965 - 2973
  • [4] Right ventricular failure after implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: early haemodynamic predictors
    Cordtz, Joakim
    Nilsson, Jens C.
    Hansen, Peter B.
    Sander, Kaare
    Olesen, Peter S.
    Boesgaard, Soren
    Gustafsson, Finn
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 45 (05) : 847 - 853
  • [5] Echocardiographic predictors of right ventricular failure after implantation of a left ventricular assist device
    Monivas Palomero, V.
    Vilches Soria, S.
    Parra Esteban, C.
    Hernandez Perez, F.
    Goirigolzarri Artaza, J.
    Gomez Bueno, M.
    Segovia Cubero, J.
    Martin Lopez, C. E.
    Forteza Gil, A.
    Gonzalez Roman, A.
    Alonso Pulpon, L.
    Mingo Santos, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 1045 - 1045
  • [6] Vasoplegia after implantation of a continuous flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, outcomes and predictors
    Eric E. C. de Waal
    Bas van Zaane
    Marnix M. van der Schoot
    Albert Huisman
    Faiz Ramjankhan
    Wilton A. van Klei
    Nandor Marczin
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 18
  • [7] Vasoplegia after implantation of a continuous flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, outcomes and predictors
    de Waal, Eric E. C.
    van Zaane, Bas
    van der Schoot, Marnix M.
    Huisman, Albert
    Ramjankhan, Faiz
    van Klei, Wilton A.
    Marczin, Nandor
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [8] Outcomes of Patients with Right Ventricular Failure on Milrinone After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Tsiouris, Athanasios
    Paone, Gaetano
    Brewer, Robert J.
    Nemeh, Hassan W.
    Borgi, Jamil
    Morgan, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2015, 61 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [9] Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation:: The need for an implantable right ventricular assist device
    Furukawa, K
    Motomura, T
    Nosé, Y
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2005, 29 (05) : 369 - 377
  • [10] Late Right Heart Failure after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Characteristics, Predictors, and Outcomes
    Alkhunaizi, Fatimah A.
    Gulati, Arune
    Muslem, Rahat
    Tedford, Ryan J.
    Choi, Chun W.
    Kilic, Ahmet
    Florido, Roberta
    Gilotra, Nisha
    Sharma, Kavita
    Hsu, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (10) : S136 - S136