Myopia or strategic behavior? Indian regimes and the East India Company in late eighteenth century India

被引:4
|
作者
Oak, Mandar [2 ]
Swamy, Anand V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Williams Coll, Dept Econ, Williamstown, MA 01267 USA
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Econ, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
War; Colonialism; India;
D O I
10.1016/j.eeh.2012.03.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The East India Company's conquest of India was facilitated by the behavior of its Indian rivals who not only did not ally against it, but often supported it militarily. Historians have typically attributed this to myopia, the failure to understand the long-term threat represented by the Company. We examine the negotiations leading up to a key conflict, the Third Mysore War, and find that the Company's allies were not myopic. The British parliament had, in 1784, passed Pitt's India Act, which limited the scope for unprovoked military aggression by the Company in India. This had changed the behavior of the Company, making its promises more credible. This enhanced credibility made it possible for the Company to secure as allies Indian regimes that were acting strategically in their self-interest. This is a new explanation for an old puzzle. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 366
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条