Coseismic slip of the 2014 Mw6.1 Napa, California Earthquake revealed by Sentinel-1A InSAR

被引:12
|
作者
Li Yong-Sheng [1 ]
Feng Wan-Peng [2 ,3 ]
Zhang Jing-Fa [1 ]
Li Zhen-Hong [4 ]
Tian Yun-Feng [1 ]
Jiang Wen-Liang [1 ,5 ]
Luo Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Key Lab Crustal Dynam, Inst Crustal Dynam, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geophys, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Glasgow, Sch Geog & Earth Sci, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Newcastle Univ, COMET, Sch Civil Engn & Geosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[5] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Sentinel-1A; Napa earthquake; West Nape Fault; Inversion of source parameters; Slip deficit; DEFORMATION; TURKEY; FAULTS; ZONE;
D O I
10.6038/cjg20150712
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
On August 24, 2014, a M(w)6.1 earthquake occurred in the Napa Valley and shook a large area of the northern San Francisco Bay, California, USA. The causative fault is believed to be part of the West Napa fault system, but little attention has been paid before the quake. The earthquake was the strongest earthquake in California USA San Francisco Bay Area in the past 25 years and caused serious damage to construction and road at Napa area and the bay area. The epicenter was located in the northern area of San Francisco Bay. It is just 40 km far away from San Andreas Fault (SAF) which is a transform plate boundary between the Pacific plate and the North American plate. On August 7, 2014, Sentinel-1A reached the predetermined orbit and Napa earthquake occurred on August 24, 2014. Sentinel-1A satellite first obtained the coseismic deformation field by two times imaging before and after Napa earthquake on August 7th and August 31st. The Sentinel-1A satellite exhibited very high imaging quality and interferometry ability. We developed the format conversion module for Sentinel-1A data and used the JPL/Caltech Repeat Orbit Interferometry PACkage(ROI_PAC, V3. 1Beta) software to process the next InSAR operation. The interferogram shows that the earthquake produced significant ground displacements with maximum uplift and subsidence of 10 cm in the satellite line of sight (LOS) respectively. Using a two-step inversion strategy, the InSAR data were combined with GPS coseismic displacements to determine the fault geometry and slip distribution. The results show that the fault parameters agree well with the observed data. The best-fit slip model in the joint inversion suggests that the major coseismic slip is concentrated on a right-lateral fault with a strike of 344, a dip of 80 and an average rake angle of 146.5 degrees. The maximum slip of similar to 1.1 m at a depth of similar to 4 km suggests that shallow slip deficit happened during the mainshock. The accumulative seismic moment was up to 1.5 X 10(8) N . m, equivalent to a magnitude of M(w)6.1. There were subtle differences in the inversion results whether the GPS data was combined with InSAR data or not, probably because the GPS data was dominated by the coseismic deformation and the InSAR data also contained significant postseismic deformation signals. The overall deformation of the earthquake fault is characterized by the right lateral strike slip motion, which is consistent with the tectonic deformation characteristics of the main large fracture zones in this region. This large fault zone includes San Andreas Fault, Rodgers Creek Fault and Green Valley Fault. Napa earthquake plays a positive role on adjustment of the regional tectonic deformation and the seismic safety of the San Francisco Bay area.
引用
收藏
页码:2339 / 2349
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Postseismic deformation due to the Mw 6.0 2004 Parkfield earthquake: Stress-driven creep on a fault with spatially variable rate-and-state friction parameters
    Barbot, Sylvain
    Fialko, Yuri
    Bock, Yehuda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2009, 114
  • [2] Benjamin J R, 2007, REP PREP CAL DEP WAT
  • [3] Bryant W A., 1982, CALIFORNIA DIVISION, V90
  • [4] SLIP RATE, EARTHQUAKE RECURRENCE, AND SEISMOGENIC POTENTIAL OF THE RODGERS CREEK FAULT ZONE, NORTHERN CALIFORNIA - INITIAL RESULTS
    BUDDING, KE
    SCHWARTZ, DP
    OPPENHEIMER, DH
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1991, 18 (03) : 447 - 450
  • [5] Deformation during the 12 November 1999 Duzce, Turkey, earthquake, from GPS and InSAR data
    Bürgmann, R
    Ayhan, ME
    Fielding, EJ
    Wright, TJ
    McClusky, S
    Aktug, B
    Demir, C
    Lenk, O
    Türkezer, A
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2002, 92 (01) : 161 - 171
  • [6] Cao T., 2003, The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps
  • [7] Phase unwrapping for large SAR interferograms: Statistical segmentation and generalized network models
    Chen, CW
    Zebker, HA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 40 (08): : 1709 - 1719
  • [8] Slicing up the San Francisco Bay Area:: block kinematics and fault slip rates from GPS-derived surface velocities -: art. no. B06403
    d'Alessio, MA
    Johanson, IA
    Bürgmann, R
    Schmidt, DA
    Murray, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2005, 110 (B6) : 1 - 19
  • [9] Fault parameters of the October 2008 Damxung Mw6.3 earthquake from InSAR inversion and its tectonic implication
    Feng Wan-Peng
    Xu Li-Sheng
    Li Zhen-Hong
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2010, 53 (05): : 1134 - 1142
  • [10] Patterns and mechanisms of coseismic and postseismic slips of the 2011 Mw 7.1 Van (Turkey) earthquake revealed by multi-platform synthetic aperture radar interferometry
    Feng, Wanpeng
    Li, Zhenhong
    Hoey, Trevor
    Zhang, Yong
    Wang, Rongjiang
    Samsonov, Sergey
    Li, Yongsheng
    Xu, Zhonghuai
    [J]. TECTONOPHYSICS, 2014, 632 : 188 - 198