共 50 条
Cost-effectiveness of Multisystemic Therapy for adolescents with antisocial behaviour: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
被引:9
|作者:
Jansen, Danielle E. M. C.
[1
,2
,3
]
Vermeulen, Karin M.
[4
]
Schuurman-Luinge, Annemieke H.
[1
]
Knorth, Erik J.
[5
]
Buskens, Erik
[4
]
Reijneveld, Sijmen A.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci, NL-9700 AD Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Sociol, NL-9712 TG Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Interuniv Ctr Social Sci Theory & Methodol ICS, NL-9712 TG Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Dept Special Needs Educ & Youth Care, NL-9712 TJ Groningen, Netherlands
来源:
关键词:
CLINICAL-TRIAL;
HEALTH SURVEY;
SERVICE USE;
FOLLOW-UP;
INTERVENTION;
SWEDEN;
D O I:
10.1186/1471-2458-13-369
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Background: Multisystemic Therapy (MST) is an intensive, short, family-and community-based treatment for serious antisocial behaviour and delinquency in youth. It is an emerging intervention for serious juvenile delinquents. However, conclusive evidence on the balance between costs and effects is limited and in fact non-existent for the Netherlands. The aim of this protocol is to describe the design of a study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of MST as compared to Care-As-Usual (CAU). Methods: The cost-effectiveness of MST will be assessed through a Randomised Controlled Trial. Primary outcomes aggressive and delinquent behaviour will be assessed with the parent-reported CBCL and adolescent-reported YSR. Health care utilisation, production loss, and quality of life are recorded using the self-report 'Trimbos and iMTA questionnaire on Costs associated with Psychiatric illness' (TiC-P), and with the MOS Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-20) and EuroQol -5D (EQ-5D), respectively. The study aims to enrol 100 clients in both conditions (MST and CAU). Data will be obtained before treatment (T1), immediately after treatment (T2; 5 months after T1) and at follow up (T3; 6 months after the end of the treatment) from a variety of sources, i.e. clients, parents/primary carers, professionals and police records. Discussion: Studying the cost-effectiveness of this treatment for youth antisocial behaviour is important in order to provide information to policy makers on whether the provision of this intervention represents good value for money. Introducing a cost-effective evidence based programme may result in valuable health gains for moderate costs.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文