Population, affluence, and environmental impact across development: Evidence from panel cointegration modeling

被引:79
|
作者
Liddle, Brantley [1 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ, Ctr Strateg Econ Studies, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia
关键词
STIRPAT; Population and environment; FMOLS panel cointegration; Environment and development; IPAT; GHG emissions; Environmental/Carbon Kuznets Curve; RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY DEMAND; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; KUZNETS CURVE; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; OECD COUNTRIES; ERROR-CORRECTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; G7; COUNTRIES; INCOME;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes urban population's and affluence's (GDP per capita's) influence on environmental impact in developed and developing countries by taking as its starting point the STIRPAT framework. In addition to considering environmental impacts particularly influenced by population and affluence (carbon emissions from transport and residential electricity consumption), the paper determines whether and, if so, how those environmental impact relationships vary across development levels by analyzing panels consisting of poor, middle, and rich countries. The development-based panels approach is an improvement on the GDP per capita polynomial model used in the Environmental Kuznets curve and other literature for several reasons: (i) it allows one to determine whether the elasticity of all variables considered varies according to development; (ii) it is arguably a more accurate description of the development process; (iii) it avoids potentially spurious regressions involving nonlinear transformations of nonstationary variables (GDP per capita squared); and (iv) unlike the polynomial model, it allows for the possibility that elasticities are significantly different across development levels but still positive-precisely the relationship expected for the environmental impacts considered here. Whether or not the elasticity for affluence was greater than that for population was a function of both the choice of dependent variable and the makeup of the panel (all countries, poor, middle, or rich). Furthermore, the estimated elasticities varied, in a nonlinear fashion, according to the development process: U-shaped, inverted U-shaped, and monotonic patterns were revealed, again, depending on the dependent variable. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 266
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Population aging and inflation: evidence from panel cointegration
    de Albuquerque, Paula C. A. M.
    Caiado, Jorge
    Pereira, Andreia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (01) : 469 - 484
  • [2] Impact of socioeconomic development on inflation in South Asia: evidence from panel cointegration analysis
    Islam, Md. Saiful
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, 2022, 30 (88): : 38 - 51
  • [3] Beyond the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Africa: Evidence from Panel Cointegration
    Osabuohien, Evans S.
    Efobi, Uchenna R.
    Gitau, Ciliaka Millicent W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2014, 16 (04) : 517 - 538
  • [4] Savings and financial sector development: panel cointegration evidence from Africa
    Kelly, Roger
    Mavrotas, George
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 14 (07): : 563 - 581
  • [5] The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis
    Majeed, Abdul
    Jiang, Ping
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Khan, Muhammad Asif
    Olah, Judit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPETITIVENESS, 2021, 13 (01) : 95 - 112
  • [6] Inequality and growth: evidence from panel cointegration
    Herzer, Dierk
    Vollmer, Sebastian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2012, 10 (04): : 489 - 503
  • [7] Are Devaluations Contractionary? Evidence from Panel Cointegration
    Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen
    Miteza, Ilir
    [J]. ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2006, 11 : 49 - 64
  • [8] Inequality and growth: evidence from panel cointegration
    Dierk Herzer
    Sebastian Vollmer
    [J]. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2012, 10 : 489 - 503
  • [9] Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the Environmental Kuznets Curve does not exist
    Perman, R
    Stern, DI
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 47 (03) : 325 - 347
  • [10] Exploring environmental - economic performance linkages in EU agriculture: evidence from a panel cointegration framework
    Zafeiriou, Eleni
    Azam, Muhammad
    Garefalakis, Alexandros
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2023, 34 (02) : 469 - 491