Quantifying structural uncertainty due to discretisation resolution and dimensionality in a hydrodynamic polder model

被引:0
|
作者
Sehnert, C. [1 ]
Huang, S. [1 ]
Lindenschmidt, K. -E. [1 ]
机构
[1] GFZ GeoForschungszentrum Potsdam, Sect 5-4 Engn Hydrol, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
hydrodynamic modelling; model structure; polder system; structural uncertainty; TRANSPORT; FLOOD;
D O I
10.2166/hydro.2009.038b
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In flood modelling, the structure of conceptual models may have a large influence on the simulation results. Hence, the focus of this paper is on the structural uncertainty in hydrodynamic flood modelling systems. Three different conceptual models with an increasing order of complexity of the spatial discretisation of the flow through a polder system were compared in order to investigate the effect of spatial resolution and dimensionality on flood modelling. The hydrodynamic 1D model DYNHYD was used as a basis for the simulations. The model was extended to incorporate a quasi-2D approach and a Monte Carlo analysis was used to show the effect of structural uncertainty on the resulting flow characteristics of the diverted flood waters. Two flood events of the River Elbe were used to calibrate and test the model. The results of the velocity fields indicate that the simplest 1D model revealed more predictive uncertainty than the other two more complex models. The differences in model structure does not cause large differences in the capping of the peak discharges, but may substantially influence the results of subsequent modelling of sediment and contaminant transport.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 30
页数:12
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Quantifying uncertainty in high-resolution coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem models
    Allen, J. I.
    Somerfield, P. J.
    Gilbert, F. J.
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS, 2007, 64 (1-4) : 3 - 14
  • [2] Quantifying uncertainty in crop model predictions due to the uncertainty in the observations used for calibration
    Confalonieri, Roberto
    Bregaglio, Simone
    Acutis, Marco
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2016, 328 : 72 - 77
  • [3] Quantifying model output uncertainty due to spatial variability of rainfall
    Chaubey, I
    Haan, CT
    Salisbury, JM
    Grunwald, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1999, 35 (05): : 1113 - 1123
  • [4] Quantifying model output uncertainty due to spatial variability of rainfall
    Center for Fresh Water Studies, Box 870206, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, United States
    不详
    不详
    不详
    J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 5 (1113-1123):
  • [5] Quantifying model structural uncertainty using airborne electromagnetic data
    Minsley, Burke J.
    Foks, Nathan Leon
    Bedrosian, Paul A.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 224 (01) : 590 - 607
  • [6] Quantifying the structural uncertainty of the aerosol mixing state representation in a modal model
    Zheng, Zhonghua
    West, Matthew
    Zhao, Lei
    Ma, Po-Lun
    Liu, Xiaohong
    Riemer, Nicole
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2021, 21 (23) : 17727 - 17741
  • [7] A method for extending stage-discharge relationships using a hydrodynamic model and quantifying the associated uncertainty
    Shao, Quanxi
    Dutta, Dushmanta
    Karim, Fazlul
    Petheram, Cuan
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2018, 556 : 154 - 172
  • [8] Evaluating the influence of topography data resolution on lake hydrodynamic model under a simulation uncertainty analysis framework
    Han, Quan
    Zhou, Ling
    Sun, Wenchao
    Wang, Jinqiang
    Ma, Chi
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2025, 186
  • [9] Quantifying uncertainty for structural damage identification in the presence of model errors from a deterministic sensitivity-based regime
    Yin, Zhiyi
    Lu, Zhong-Rong
    Liu, Jike
    Wang, Li
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 267
  • [10] Conclusion or Illusion: Quantifying Uncertainty in Inverse Analyses From Marker-Based Motion Capture due to Errors in Marker Registration and Model Scaling
    Uchida, Thomas K.
    Seth, Ajay
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10