Animacy increases second target reporting in a rapid serial visual presentation task

被引:32
|
作者
Guerrero, Guadalupe [1 ]
Calvillo, Dustin P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ San Marcos, Dept Psychol, 333 South Twin Oaks Valley Rd, San Marcos, CA 92096 USA
关键词
Attentional blink; Animate monitoring; Threat superiority; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; INATTENTIONAL BLINDNESS; WORKING-MEMORY; FEAR; IDENTIFICATION; RELEVANCE; STIMULI; SNAKES;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-016-1040-7
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Attentional blink occurs when two target items, T1 and T2, are presented within brief moments of each other in a series of rapidly presented items and participants fail to report T2. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of characteristics of T2 on T2 reporting. Participants (N = 67) completed 4 blocks of 40 trials. Each trial consisted of 15 images, two of which were designated as T1 and T2. T2 was manipulated in three ways: animacy (animate or inanimate), threat (threatening or nonthreatening), and lag (200 ms or 400 ms after T1). The results indicated that more T2s were reported at the longer lag and that animate objects were reported more often than inanimate objects at both lags. Threat did not have a significant effect on T2 reporting although it interacted with lag: threatening objects were reported more frequently than nonthreatening objects at lag 2 but this trend reversed at lag 4. The results were consistent with the animate monitoring hypothesis, which claims that animate objects, because of their importance in ancestral environments, attract attention more easily than inanimate objects. Animate objects appear to capture attention more easily than inanimate objects as second targets in a rapid serial visual presentation task. This result is similar to animacy advantages reported with other attention tasks and with memory tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:1832 / 1838
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Animacy increases second target reporting in a rapid serial visual presentation task
    Guadalupe Guerrero
    Dustin P. Calvillo
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2016, 23 : 1832 - 1838
  • [2] Functional visual field in a rapid serial visual presentation task
    Kikuchi, T
    Sekine, M
    Nakamura, M
    [J]. JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 43 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [3] A regression method for estimating performance in a rapid serial visual presentation target detection task
    Files, Benjamin T.
    Marathe, Amar R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2016, 258 : 114 - 123
  • [4] EEG Classification Algorithm for Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Task
    Li B.-W.
    Liu Z.-W.
    Gao X.-G.
    Lin Y.-F.
    [J]. Beijing Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2019, 39 : 186 - 190
  • [6] A Maximum Likelihood Method for Estimating Performance in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Target-Detection Task
    Canady, Jonroy D.
    Marathe, Amar R.
    Herman, David H.
    Files, Benjamin T.
    [J]. VIRTUAL, AUGMENTED AND MIXED REALITY: INTERACTION, NAVIGATION, VISUALIZATION, EMBODIMENT, AND SIMULATION, VAMR 2018, PT I, 2018, 10909 : 383 - 392
  • [7] Rapid Visual Processing of Picture Stimuli by Pigeons in an RSVP (Rapid Serial Visual Presentation) Task
    Jitsumori, Masako
    Ushitani, Tomokazu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION, 2017, 43 (02): : 127 - 138
  • [8] Impact of target probability on single-trial EEG target detection in a difficult rapid serial visual presentation task
    Cecotti, Hubert
    Sato-Reinhold, Joyce
    Sy, Jocelyn L.
    Elliott, James C.
    Eckstein, Miguel P.
    Giesbrecht, Barry
    [J]. 2011 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2011, : 6381 - 6384
  • [9] LOCUS OF THE EXPERIMENTAL EFFECTS IN THE RAPID SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION (RSVP) TASK
    MITCHELL, DC
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1979, 25 (02): : 143 - 149
  • [10] Effects of task factors on selection by color in the rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task
    Vierck, Esther
    Miller, Jeff
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2006, 68 (08): : 1324 - 1337