Effects of stocking rate, forage management, and grazing management on performance and economics of cow-calf production in Southwest Arkansas

被引:5
|
作者
Beck, P. A. [1 ]
Stewart, C. B. [1 ]
Sims, M. B. [1 ]
Gadberry, M. S. [2 ]
Jennings, J. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Div Agr, Southwest Res & Extens Ctr, Hope, AR 71801 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Div Agr, Cooperat Extens Serv, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
关键词
cool-season annual grasses; cow calf; economics; rotational grazing; stockpiled bermudagrass; BEEF-COWS; EFFICIENCY; CALVES;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2016-0634
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective this research was to determine the effect of application of multiple grazing management practices at 2 stocking rates (SR) on the productivity and economics of the cow-calf enterprise in the Southeastern United States over a 4-yr period. Pasture management systems included: continuous grazing management at a moderate SR (0.8 ha/cow; CG) without additional forage management, rotational grazing management at a moderate SR (0.8 ha/ cow (MR) with addition of stockpiled bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] and complementary cool season annuals, and rotational grazing management similar to MR but with a high SR (0.4 ha/cow; HR). Stockpiling in MR and HR was managed by fertilization of 0.2 ha/cow of bermudagrass in early August with 168 kg ammonium nitrate and deferring grazing until November. Wheat (Triticum aestivum; 112 kg/ha) and annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.; 28 kg/ha) were interseeded (0.2 ha/cow) in HR and MR with a no-till drill in the fall. Cow and calf performance and economics data were analyzed by ANOVA using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) and pregnancy percentage was analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS; pasture was the experimental unit and year was the random block. Hay feeding days decreased (P < 0.01) from 107 +/- 10.9 d for CG to 37 +/- 10.9 d for HR, which was further reduced (P = 0.01) to 15 +/- 10.9 d for MR. Pregnancy percentage did not differ (P = 0.20) among treatments. Weaning BW in CG (237 +/- 7.3 kg) tended (P = 0.09) to be greater than in MR (227 +/- 7.3 kg) and were greater (P < 0.01) than in HR (219 +/- 7.3 kg). However, total weaning BW per hectare was 89% greater (P < 0.01) for HR compared with CG and MR, which did not differ (P = 0.31). With rotational stocking, there was the opportunity to harvest excess forage as hay in both MR and HR with a net value of US$52.90/ha +/- 25.73 and $15.50/ha +/- 25.73, respectively. Net returns per hectare did not differ (P = 0.30) between CG ($429 +/- 63.0/ha) and MR ($479 +/- 63.0/ ha) but were increased (P < 0.01) by 107% by HR ($1,024 +/- 63.0/ha). Using rotational grazing, stockpiled bermudagrass, and complementary cool-season annual grasses can drastically reduce winter feed requirements and simultaneously increase carrying capacity and net return.
引用
收藏
页码:3996 / 4005
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of stocking rate, forage management, and grazing management on performance and economics of cow-calf production in Southwest Arkansas.
    Beck, P.
    Stewart, B.
    Sims, M.
    Jennings, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 26 - 26
  • [2] Effects of stocking method and rate on seasonal cow-calf performance and forage quality
    Wyatt, W. E.
    Venut, B. C.
    Gillespie, J. M.
    Blouin, D. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2004, 87 : 39 - 39
  • [3] Effects of stocking method and rate on seasonal cow-calf performance and forage quality
    Wyatt, W. E.
    Venuto, B. C.
    Gillespie, J. M.
    Blouin, D. C.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 83 : 39 - 39
  • [4] Effects of stocking method and rate on seasonal cow-calf performance and forage quality
    Wyatt, W. E.
    Venuto, B. C.
    Gillespie, J. M.
    Blouin, D. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2004, 82 : 39 - 39
  • [5] Effects of cow-calf production system and postweaning management on calf performance
    Gardine, S. E.
    Boyd, B. M.
    Bittner, C. J.
    Hilscher, F. H.
    Erickson, G. E.
    Jenkins, K. H.
    Klopfenstein, T. J.
    Watson, A. K.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 35 (01): : 66 - 73
  • [6] FORAGE AND HERD MANAGEMENT TO REDUCE RISK IN COW-CALF PRODUCTION
    GEBREMESKEL, T
    SHUMWAY, CR
    [J]. TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION PROGRESS REPORT, 1980, (3594): : 79 - 82
  • [7] Risk Management in Forage Production of Cow-Calf Systems of Appalachia
    Newman, Christina L.
    Abaye, A. Ozzie
    Clapham, William M.
    Tracy, Benjamin F.
    Swecker, William S.
    Maguire, Rory O.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2012, 104 (02) : 337 - 343
  • [8] Stocking rate and cow-calf production on sand sagebrush rangeland
    Gillen, RL
    Sims, PL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 55 (06): : 542 - 550
  • [9] Effects of Winter Cow-Calf Production System on Cow-Calf Performance.
    Gardine, S. E.
    Warner, J. M.
    Bondurant, R. G.
    Hilscher, F. H.
    Jenkins, K. H.
    Erickson, G. E.
    Klopfenstein, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 248 - 249
  • [10] Optimizing pasture management for cow-calf production: the roles of rotational frequency and stocking rate in the context of system efficiency
    Phillip, LE
    Goldsmith, P
    Bergeron, M
    Peterson, PR
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (01) : 47 - 56