Effects of crop rotation, residue retention and sowing time on the incidence and survival of ascochyta blight and its effect on grain yield of field peas (Pisum sativum L.)

被引:40
|
作者
McDonald, G. K. [1 ]
Peck, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Agr Food & Wine, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
关键词
Rotation; Crop loss; Fungicide; Residue retention; Sowing date; MYCOSPHAERELLA-PINODES; EPIDEMIOLOGY; DISEASES; TILLAGE; LEGUMES; GROWTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2008.10.001
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Ascochyta blight is endemic in many regions where field pea (Pisum sativum) is grown, causing significant losses in grain yield. Crop management is the main method used to reduce the severity of disease and minimise yield losses, but with varying degrees of success. This is likely to be due to variation in the production and survival of inoculum. A 6-year experiment was conducted in which disease pressure was manipulated by crop rotation, residue retention, time of sowing and fungicide treatment. The experiment measured the amount and persistence of inoculum on crop residues and in soil as well as its dispersal in the air during the growing season, and assessed disease development and yield. Aerial inoculum from infected pea residues was the main source of infection, followed by soil-borne inoculum. Soil-borne inoculum declined slowly. The average rate of decline in soil inoculum was 15% per year, suggesting that a break of 6 years is required to reduce soil inoculum by 90%. This slow decline meant that increasing the disease break from 2 to 4 years did not consistently reduce the severity of disease or improve grain yield. By comparison, inoculum on pea crop residues declined rapidly after one season. Aerial inoculum was released from residues in two main periods: in autumn, before the pea crop was sown, and also in spring. Very little aerial inoculum was measured in winter. Rainfall in summer and autumn influenced inoculum release prior to sowing and reduced the disease pressure during establishment of the crop. Aerial inoculum was exhausted once 193 mm of rainfall had been received after 1 December. Delayed sowing was the best strategy for reducing the level of disease by avoiding the autumn peak in aerial inoculum. Disease severity was more than halved and grain yield increased by 6% by delaying sowing by 3-4 weeks. However, in the absence of disease, grain yield of early-sown crops was 20% greater than that of late-sown crops. A strategy of early sowing and the strategic use of fungicide may enable the dual goals of reduced disease and improved yields to be achieved. Early sowing without the disease penalty may be possible in seasons that have high summer and autumn rainfall, which results in the release of ascospores prior to sowing. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 21
页数:11
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Effect of sowing date on the severity of ascochyta blight in field peas (Pisum sativum L.) grown in the Wimmera region of Victoria
    Bretag, TW
    Keane, PJ
    Price, TV
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2000, 40 (08): : 1113 - 1119
  • [2] EFFECT OF ASCOCHYTA BLIGHT ON THE GRAIN-YIELD OF FIELD PEAS (PISUM-SATIVUM L) GROWN IN SOUTHERN AUSTRALIA
    BRETAG, TW
    KEANE, PJ
    PRICE, TV
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1995, 35 (04): : 531 - 536
  • [3] Studies on the Control of Ascochyta Blight in Field Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Caused by Ascochyta pinodes in Zhejiang Province, China
    Liu, Na
    Xu, Shengchun
    Yao, Xiefeng
    Zhang, Guwen
    Mao, Weihua
    Hu, Qizan
    Feng, Zhijuan
    Gong, Yaming
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [4] Effect of harvest time on yield and pre-harvest quality of semi-leafless grain peas (Pisum sativum L.) as whole-crop forage
    Borreani, Giorgio
    Peiretti, Pier Giorgio
    Tabacco, Ernesto
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2007, 100 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [5] The Influence of Different Fertilization Strategies on the Grain Yield of Field Peas (Pisum sativum L.) under Conventional and Conservation Tillage
    Macak, Milan
    Candrakova, Eva
    Dalovic, Ivica
    Prasad, P. V. Vara
    Farooq, Muhammad
    Korczyk-Szabo, Joanna
    Kovacik, Peter
    Simansky, Vladimir
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (11):
  • [6] N-utilization by maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced by crop rotation and field pea (Pisum sativum L.) residue management
    Bahl, GS
    Pasricha, NS
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 16 (03) : 230 - 231
  • [7] Integration of host resistance and fungicides reduced ascochyta blight pressure and minimised yield loss in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) in southern Ethiopia
    Mengesha, Getachew Gudero
    Terefe, Habtamu
    Yae, Abu Jambo
    Arato, Asinake Abera
    Betrire, Merihun Gimja
    Shago, Tamirat Samuel
    Bires, Zemenu Fentahun
    Borano, Biniyam Boraysho
    Abebe, Shiferaw Mekonnen
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 72 (01): : 971 - 986
  • [8] THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SOWING SYSTEM AND RATIOS ON GRAIN YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS AND USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES IN INTERCROPPING OF PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) AND WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)
    Ton, Aybegun
    Anlarsal, Adem Emin
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2019, 28 (07): : 5502 - 5511
  • [9] Estimation of Heterosis and the Combining Ability Effect for Yield and Its Attributes in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Using PCA and GGE Biplots
    Sharma, Amit
    Yadav, Rajesh
    Sheoran, Ravika
    Kaushik, Deepak
    Mohanta, Tapan Kumar
    Sharma, Kartik
    Yadav, Alpa
    Dhanda, Parmdeep Singh
    Kaushik, Prashant
    [J]. HORTICULTURAE, 2023, 9 (02)
  • [10] Estimation of Heterosis and the Combining Ability Effect for Yield and Its Attributes in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Using PCA and GGE Biplots (vol 9, 256 ,2023)
    Sharma, Amit
    Yadav, Rajesh
    Sheoran, Ravika
    Kaushik, Deepak
    Mohanta, Tapan Kumar
    Sharma, Kartik
    Yadav, Alpa
    Dhanda, Parmdeep Singh
    Kaushik, Prashant
    [J]. HORTICULTURAE, 2024, 10 (07)