Single-item electronic administration of the SF-36v2 Health Survey

被引:5
|
作者
Turner-Bowker, Diane M. [1 ]
Saris-Baglama, Renee N. [2 ]
DeRosa, Michael A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Invivodata Inc, Pittsburgh, PA 15203 USA
[2] Datacorp, Smithfield, RI 02917 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SF-36; Patient-reported outcomes; Computerized survey; Health-related quality of life; Headache; EQUIVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-012-0169-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the psychometric properties and factor structure of a computerized electronic version of the SF-36v2 Health Survey (SF-36v2) with items administered one-per-page versus the traditional grid format used in the paper-and-pencil version in a sample of physician-diagnosed headache patients. Patients (N = 180) completed the SF-36v2 administered as part of a broader study of health outcomes. Scaling assumptions, reliability, factor structure, and the tool's ability to discriminate between headache pain severity groups were examined. Frequency distributions showed notable ceiling effects for the role emotional, social functioning, physical functioning, and role physical scales, but negligible (< 1.2%) floor effects for any of the scales. Internal consistency reliability coefficients ranged from 0.81 to 0.95 for the eight health domains. Items passed tests of internal consistency and discriminant validity. Principal components' analyses confirmed the 2-factor structure; the pattern of correlations across scales was consistent with expectations for the physical and mental health components. As expected, patients with severe headache pain had lower mean SF-36v2 scores than those with mild or moderate pain. No significant score differences were observed between mild and moderate pain severity groups. Single-item electronic administration of the SF-36v2 is reliable and valid for use with headache patients.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 490
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single-item electronic administration of the SF-36v2 Health Survey
    Diane M. Turner-Bowker
    Renee N. Saris-Baglama
    Michael A. DeRosa
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2013, 22 : 485 - 490
  • [2] PSYCHOMETRIC COMPARIBILITY OF SINGLE ITEM AND GRID FORM ADMINISTRATION OF THE SF-36V2™ HEALTH SURVEY
    Smith, K. J.
    Kosinski, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (03) : A150 - A150
  • [3] DERIVATION OF INTERPRETATION THRESHOLDS FOR THE SF-36V2® HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36V2) IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    Chen, W. H.
    Rendas-Baum, R.
    Lin, X.
    Kosinski, M.
    Bjorner, J. B.
    Bracher, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S247 - S247
  • [4] PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION OF THE SF-36V2® HEALTH SURVEY IN AN AL AMYLOIDOSIS POPULATION
    White, M. K.
    Bayliss, M.
    McCausland, K. L.
    Guthrie, S.
    [J]. HAEMATOLOGICA, 2016, 101 : 596 - 596
  • [5] Content validation of the SF-36v2® health survey with al amyloidosis patients
    White M.K.
    Bayliss M.S.
    Guthrie S.D.
    Raymond K.P.
    Rizio A.A.
    McCausland K.L.
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 1 (1)
  • [6] Content validation of the SF-36v2® Health Survey Acute for use in hypoparathyroidism
    Meryl Brod
    Laura Tesler Waldman
    Aimee D. Shu
    Alden Smith
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 1795 - 1806
  • [7] Content validation of the SF-36v2® Health Survey Acute for use in hypoparathyroidism
    Brod, Meryl
    Waldman, Laura Tesler
    Shu, Aimee D.
    Smith, Alden
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (06) : 1795 - 1806
  • [8] Best practice approaches to patient cognitive debriefing of the SF-36v2 Health Survey
    Bayliss, Martha
    White, Michelle K.
    Raymond, Kimberly
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 72 - 72
  • [9] Is Health Preference Derived from the SF-36v2 Equivalent to that Measured by the SF-6D Health Survey?
    Lam, Cindy L.
    Wong, Carlos K.
    Lam, Elegance T.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 105 - 105
  • [10] US general population norms for telephone administration of the SF-36v2
    Maglinte, Gregory A.
    Hays, Ron D.
    Kaplan, Robert M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (05) : 497 - 502