Religious pluralism and participation: Why previous research is wrong

被引:151
|
作者
Voas, D [1 ]
Olson, DVA
Crockett, A
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Sociol Studies, Sheffield S10 2TU, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Indiana Univ, South Bend, IN 46615 USA
[3] Univ Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3088893
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Does religious pluralisin undermine or promote religious in involvement? Some secularization theories contend that diversity breeds loss of belief and lower participation. The religious economies model counters that involvement is boosted by the availability of alternative religious suppliers and the competition that results, with each group working harder to gain adherents. The issue is sufficiently important that a recent review found 193 tests of this question in 26 published articles. Almost all of these findings (both positive and negative) should be abandoned. The associations reported do not reflect the effects of pluralism but a previously overlooked mathematical relationship between measures of religious participation and the index of pluralism. Even when pluralisin has no effect oil participation, the correlation between these two variables is likely, to be nonzero, The sign and magnitude of this expected correlation depend oil the nature of the size distributions of the religious groups across the areas studied, Results from several frequently cited studies closely match it-hat would be expected from chance alone. Various alternative methods for studying pluralisin in future research are examined, but currently there is no compelling evidence that religious pluralisin has any effect on religious participation.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 230
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条