Has China's Belt and Road Initiative Intensified Bilateral Trade Links between China and the Involved Countries?

被引:33
|
作者
Yu, Chunjiao [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ren [3 ]
An, Lian [4 ]
Yu, Zhixing [2 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ, Sch Business, Dept Int Econ & Trade, Wuhan 430062, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Univ, Open Econ Res Ctr, Wuhan 430062, Peoples R China
[3] Texas State Univ, Dept Finance & Econ, McCoy Coll Business Adm, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
[4] Univ North Florida, Coggin Coll Business, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
Belt and Boad Initiative; bilateral revealed trade preference index; difference-in-differences methodology; BUSINESS-CYCLE SYNCHRONIZATION; ASIA;
D O I
10.3390/su12176747
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is designed to intensify reciprocal trade preferentiality between China and the Belt-Road countries. However, there has been little research empirically examining the policy effects on the trade links between China and the involved countries. This paper attempts to evaluate the BRI effects quantitatively by constructing a new bilateral revealed trade preference index to measure the bilateral trade preferentiality between China and its 114 trading partners. Using a difference in differences model, we show that the trade of China with the Belt-Road countries has become more preferentially linked since the implementation of the BRI. In particular, the bilateral revealed trade preference index between China and the Belt-Road countries has grown approximately 8% faster than has that with the non-Belt-Road countries. We further show that the BRI effects are heterogeneous across different regions. The bilateral trade links have been more significantly intensified in the regions of the China-Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, the China-Central Asia-West Asia Economic Corridor and the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor. The findings strongly indicate that BRI has been acting as a catalyst for intensifying bilateral trade preferentiality between China and the Belt-Road countries.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impacts of the belt and road initiative on China's bilateral trade
    Wang, Jing
    Tian, Xi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2022, 27 (03) : 400 - 424
  • [2] Evolution of the bilateral trade situation between Belt and Road countries and China
    Xiong, Yunjun
    Xu, Rongbang
    Wu, Sanmang
    Li, Shantong
    Li, Li
    Li, Qiuping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 414
  • [3] The Belt and Road Initiative and Cultural Bias in Bilateral Trade with China
    Kapma, Ryan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2023, 57 (01) : 172 - 191
  • [4] The Belt and Road Initiative and China's Trade Development
    Tong, Sarah Y.
    Yi, Zheng
    [J]. CHINA-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (04) : 50 - 61
  • [5] CHINA'S ROAD TRANSPORT IS INVOLVED IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE "BELT AND ROAD" INITIATIVE
    Sazonov, S. L.
    Xiao, Chen
    [J]. 70 LYET SOVRYEMYENNOMOO KITAYSKOMOO GOSOODARSTVOO, 2019, : 293 - +
  • [6] Factors Affecting the Trade Dependence Relationship of Asian Countries with China: Implications for China's Belt and Road Initiative
    Yang, Wei
    Xue, Feihuang
    Shi, Jinfeng
    Shao, Yanmin
    Wang, Di
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [7] The impact of China's financing to Africa on bilateral trade intensity under the Belt and Road Initiative
    Wu, Yan
    Wang, Xueyu
    Hu, Cong
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 56 (37) : 4507 - 4527
  • [8] Embodied carbon transfer between China and the Belt and Road Initiative countries
    Zhang, Zhenjun
    Chen, Weiming
    [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 378
  • [9] Embodied carbon transfer between China and the Belt and Road Initiative countries
    Zhang, Zhenjun
    Chen, Weiming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 378
  • [10] Does Infrastructure Matter? Potential Impacts of China's Belt and Road Initiative on Its Bilateral Trade
    Que Ying
    Pu Hualin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS LINGUISTICS AND INTERCULTURAL BUSINESS COMMUNICATION, 2017, 2017, : 272 - 277