Separation and Elevated Residential Mobility: A Cross-Country Comparison

被引:10
|
作者
Kulu, Hill [1 ]
Mikolai, Julia [1 ]
Thomas, Michael J. [2 ,3 ]
Vidal, Sergi [4 ]
Schnor, Christine [5 ]
Willaert, Didier [6 ]
Visser, Fieke H. L. [7 ]
Mulder, Clara H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[2] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Populat Res Ctr, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Stat Norway, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Ctr Demog Studies, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Catholic Univ Louvain, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
[6] Vrije Univ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Econ Geog, Groningen, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Divorce; Separation; Residential mobility; Migration; Poisson regression; Cross-national comparison; Housing markets; LIFE-COURSE; UNION DISSOLUTION; ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES; HOUSING AFFORDABILITY; HOME OWNERSHIP; GREAT-BRITAIN; FAMILY HOME; DIVORCE; MIGRATION; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10680-020-09561-1
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates the magnitude and persistence of elevated post-separation residential mobility (i.e. residential instability) in five countries (Australia, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK) with similar levels of economic development, but different welfare provisions and housing markets. While many studies examine residential changes related to separation in selected individual countries, only very few have compared patterns across countries. Using longitudinal data and applying Poisson regression models, we study the risk of a move of separated men and women compared with cohabiting and married individuals. We use time since separation to distinguish between moves due to separation and moves of separated individuals. Our analysis shows that separated men and women are significantly more likely to move than cohabiting and married individuals. The risk of a residential change is the highest shortly after separation, and it decreases with duration since separation. However, the magnitude of this decline varies by country. In Belgium, mobility rates remain elevated for a long period after separation, whereas in the Netherlands, post-separation residential instability appears brief, with mobility rates declining rapidly. The results suggest that housing markets are likely to shape the residential mobility of separated individuals. In countries, where mortgages are easy to access and affordable rental properties are widespread, separated individuals can rapidly adjust their housing to new family circumstances; in contrast, in countries with limited access to homeownership and small social rental markets, separated individuals experience a prolonged period of residential instability.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 150
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Separation and Elevated Residential Mobility: A Cross-Country Comparison
    Hill Kulu
    Júlia Mikolai
    Michael J. Thomas
    Sergi Vidal
    Christine Schnor
    Didier Willaert
    Fieke H. L. Visser
    Clara H. Mulder
    [J]. European Journal of Population, 2021, 37 : 121 - 150
  • [2] Separation, divorce, and housing tenure: A cross-country comparison
    Mikolai, Julia
    Kulu, Hill
    Vidal, Sergi
    van der Wiel, Roselinde
    Mulder, Clara H.
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH, 2019, 41 : 1131 - 1145
  • [3] Mobility and innovation: A cross-country comparison in the video games industry
    Storz, Cornelia
    Riboldazzi, Federico
    John, Moritz
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (01) : 121 - 137
  • [4] Cross-country differences in intergenerational earnings mobility
    Solon, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 16 (03): : 59 - 66
  • [5] CROSS-COUNTRY RANKINGS IN INTERGENERATIONAL MOBILITY: A COMPARISON OF APPROACHES FROM ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY
    Blanden, Jo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2013, 27 (01) : 38 - 73
  • [6] Aging in Europe: A cross-country comparison
    Nicoletti, C
    Peracchi, F
    [J]. PENSION POLICY IN AN INTEGRATING EUROPE, 2003, : 23 - 66
  • [7] A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency
    Jiancheng Guan
    Kairui Zuo
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100 : 541 - 575
  • [8] Trust and deforestation: A cross-country comparison
    Murtazashvili, Ilia
    Murtazashvili, Jennifer
    Salahodjaev, Raufhon
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 101 : 111 - 119
  • [9] A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency
    Guan, Jiancheng
    Zuo, Kairui
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 100 (02) : 541 - 575
  • [10] Optimism and pessimism: A cross-country comparison
    Rehman, Fahd
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2020, 43 (11): : 3025 - 3038