Risk assessment - can we achieve consensus?

被引:47
|
作者
Twetman, Svante [1 ]
Fontana, Margherita [2 ]
Featherstone, John D. B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Inst Dendrol, Dept Cariol Endodont Pediat Dent & Clin Genet, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Cariol Restorat Sci & Endodont, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Dent, Dept Prevent & Restorat Dent Sci, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Caries management; prediction; risk factors; CARIES MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; DENTAL PRACTICE; PREVENTIVE STRATEGY; ASSESSMENT PROGRAM; RESEARCH NETWORK; CARIOGRAM MODEL; DENTISTS USE; FOLLOW-UP; CHILDREN; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1111/cdoe.12026
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective The object of this conference paper was to review and discuss caries risk assessment in general practice from the questions i) Why, ii) When, and iii) How. Method Narrative review. Results i) Patient caries risk assessment is the basic component in the decision-making process for adequate prevention and management of dental caries and for determination of individual recall intervals. ii) Caries risk assessment should always be performed at a child's first dental visit and then regularly throughout life, and especially when social or medical life events are occurring. iii) There are several risk assessment methods and models available for but the evidence for their validity is limited. Although there is no clearly superior method for predicting future caries, the use of structured protocols combining socioeconomy, behavior, general health, diet, oral hygiene routines, clinical data, and salivary tests or computer-based systems are considered best clinical practice. The accuracy ranges between 60% and 90%, depending on age. Caries risk assessment is more effective in the selection of patients at low risk than those with high caries risk. Conclusion As evidence suggests that past caries experience is far from ideal but the most important single risk component for more caries at all ages, any clinical sign of likely active demineralization on smooth, occlusal, and proximal tooth surfaces should be taken as a signal for the implementation of individually designed preventive and disease management measures.
引用
收藏
页码:e64 / e70
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Editorial Commentary: Can We Achieve Personalized Risk Assessment in Hip Arthroscopy?
    Vail, Thomas Parker
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (02): : 471 - 472
  • [2] Can we achieve consensus on central venous catheter-related infections?
    Fraenkel, DJ
    Rickard, C
    Lipman, J
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2000, 28 (05) : 475 - 490
  • [3] Electrophysiologic refinement of risk stratification: Can we achieve the goal?
    Israel, CW
    Hohnloser, SH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 15 (02) : 177 - 178
  • [4] Leaning Toward a Consensus About Dynamic Assessment: Can We? Do We Want To?
    Lidz, Carol
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 13 (03): : 292 - 307
  • [5] Atherogenic risk assessment - Can we improve it?
    Puzo Foncillas, Jose
    [J]. CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, 2024, 36 (01): : 33 - 34
  • [6] Afghanistan: What Can We Achieve?
    Cohen, Michael A.
    [J]. DISSENT, 2011, 58 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [7] Campaign shows we can achieve
    不详
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2000, 78 (04) : 225 - 225
  • [8] Cardiorenal risk reduction guidance in diabetes: can we reach consensus?
    Sattar, Naveed
    McMurray, John J. V.
    Cheng, Alice Y. Y.
    [J]. LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 8 (05): : 357 - 360
  • [9] Carcinogen risk assessment. Can we harmonise?
    Di Marco, PN
    Priestly, BG
    Buckett, KJ
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1998, 103 : 241 - 246
  • [10] CAN WE IMPROVE OUR FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT?
    Kakkar, Vishal
    Glasser, Benjamin
    The, Lee-Suan
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 56 : 200 - 201