Evaluation the efficacy and safety of simultaneous splenectomy in liver transplantation patients: A meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
He, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xiaojuan [3 ]
Peng, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chuan [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Tian-fu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Liver Surg, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Liver Transplantat Ctr, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
efficacy; liver transplantation; meta-analysis; safety; splenectomy; HEPATITIS-C VIRUS; FOR-SIZE SYNDROME; SPLENIC ARTERY LIGATION; SPLENORENAL SHUNTS; PORTAL PRESSURE; INCREASED RISK; FOLLOW-UP; GRAFT; SURVIVAL; RECIPIENTS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000010087
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Simultaneous splenectomy during liver transplantation (LT) is debated. The present meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of splenectomy on the outcome of LT patients.Methods:We searched PubMed, Embase, and Wanfang databases for relevant studies published until the date of July 15, 2017. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale judgment. The data were analyzed using RevMan5.3 software.Results:A total of 16 studies consisting of 2198 patients (892 patients received splenectomy during LT [SPLT group] and 1306 patients received LT only [LT group]) were included in the present meta-analysis. Efficacy analysis revealed that pooled hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) between 2 groups was not significantly different (hazard ratio=1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.50). SPLT group had less postoperative rejection (odds ratio [OR]=0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.79) and small for size syndrome (OR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.79). SPLT group had significantly lower preoperative platelet (mean difference [MD]=-17.23, 95% CI: -19.54, -14.91), but significantly higher postoperative platelet (MD=170.45, 95% CI: 108.33-232.56). Conversely, SPLT group had significant higher preoperative portal pressure (MD=1.54, 95% CI: 0.75-2.33) and significant lower postoperative portal pressure (MD=-1.17, 95% CI: -2.24, -0.11). Safety analysis revealed that SPLT group had significantly longer operation time (MD=56.66, 95% CI: 35.96-77.35), more intraoperative blood loss (MD=1.08, 95% CI: 0.25-1.91), and more intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (MD=3.77, 95% CI: 3.22-4.33). Furthermore, SPLT group had significantly higher incidence of postoperative hemorrhage (OR=3.07, 95% CI: 1.92-4.91), postoperative thrombosis (OR=3.63, 95% CI: 1.06-12.45), and perioperative infection (OR=2.62, 95% CI: 1.76-3.90). In addition, perioperative mortality was significantly higher in the SPLT group (OR=3.14, 95% CI: 1.31-7.52). Postoperative hospital stay did not differ significantly between 2 groups (OR=-1.75, 95% CI: -3.66-0.16).Conclusions:Splenectomy benefits LT patients in increasing platelet count. However, splenectomy is a morbid procedure as splenectomy increases operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative RBC transfusion, and postoperative complications. Splenectomy does not improve OS but increase perioperative mortality. Therefore, splenectomy should be performed only in selective patients.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of liver transplantation in patients with cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gu, Jinyang
    Bai, Jianling
    Shi, Xiaolei
    Zhou, Jianxin
    Qiu, Yudong
    Wu, Yafu
    Jiang, Chunping
    Sun, Xitai
    Xu, Fanggui
    Zhang, Yue
    Ding, Yitao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 130 (09) : 2155 - 2163
  • [2] Prognosis evaluation of liver transplant patients with splenectomy - a meta-analysis
    Chen, M.
    Lin, X.
    Huang, B.
    Ju, W.
    Chen, Y.
    Wang, D.
    He, X.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (08) : 134 - 134
  • [3] Impact of splenectomy on prognosis of liver transplantation: a meta-analysis
    Chen, M.
    Huang, B.
    Deng, R.
    Ma, Y.
    He, X.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : 164 - 165
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of antifibrinolytic drugs in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Molenaar, I. Q.
    Warnaar, N.
    Groen, H.
    TenVergert, E. M.
    Slooff, M. J. H.
    Porte, R. J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (01) : 185 - 194
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of liver transplantation for methylmalonic acidemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yi-Zhou
    Zhou, Guang-Peng
    Wu, Shan-Shan
    Kong, Yuan-Yuan
    Zhu, Zhi-Jun
    Sun, Li-Ying
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION REVIEWS, 2021, 35 (01)
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of probiotics and prebiotics in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Ming
    Wang, Xiaodong
    Li, Junjie
    Jiang, Wentao
    [J]. NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 36 (04) : 808 - 819
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of preoperative splenic artery embolization for splenectomy: A meta-analysis
    Liang, Rong
    Zhu, Zhe-Yu
    Wang, Yun-Bing
    Ding, Xiong
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (07) : 3181 - 3182
  • [8] Sequential vs simultaneous revascularization in patients undergoing liver transplantation:A meta-analysis
    Jia-Zhong Wang
    Yang Liu
    Jin-Long Wang
    Le Lu
    Ya-Fei Zhang
    Hong-Wei Lu
    Yi-Ming Li
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, (22) : 7036 - 7046
  • [9] Sequential vs simultaneous revascularization in patients undergoing liver transplantation: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Jia-Zhong
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Jin-Long
    Lu, Le
    Zhang, Ya-Fei
    Lu, Hong-Wei
    Li, Yi-Ming
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (22) : 7036 - 7046
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of aprotinin in liver transplantation: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
    Molenaar, IQ
    Greon, H
    Slooff, MJH
    ten Vergert, EM
    Porte, RJ
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 11 (07) : C1 - C1