Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers

被引:65
|
作者
Chen, Jiayun [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xingsong [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Hongbin [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Yuhuan [1 ,2 ]
Du, Hongli [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Biol & Biol Engn, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
GENOME; SETS; MAP;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-019-45835-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The development and innovation of next generation sequencing (NGS) and the subsequent analysis tools have gain popularity in scientific researches and clinical diagnostic applications. Hence, a systematic comparison of the sequencing platforms and variant calling pipelines could provide significant guidance to NGS-based scientific and clinical genomics. In this study, we compared the performance, concordance and operating efficiency of 27 combinations of sequencing platforms and variant calling pipelines, testing three variant calling pipelines-Genome Analysis Tool Kit HaplotypeCaller, Strelka2 and Samtools-Varscan2 for nine data sets for the NA12878 genome sequenced by different platforms including BGISEQ500, MGISEQ2000, HiSeq4000, NovaSeq and HiSeq Xten. For the variants calling performance of 12 combinations in WES datasets, all combinations displayed good performance in calling SNPs, with their F-scores entirely higher than 0.96, and their performance in calling INDELs varies from 0.75 to 0.91. And all 15 combinations in WGS datasets also manifested good performance, with F-scores in calling SNPs were entirely higher than 0.975 and their performance in calling INDELs varies from 0.71 to 0.93. All of these combinations manifested high concordance in variant identification, while the divergence of variants identification in WGS datasets were larger than that in WES datasets. We also down-sampled the original WES and WGS datasets at a series of gradient coverage across multiple platforms, then the variants calling period consumed by the three pipelines at each coverage were counted, respectively. For the GIAB datasets on both BGI and Illumina platforms, Strelka2 manifested its ultra-performance in detecting accuracy and processing efficiency compared with other two pipelines on each sequencing platform, which was recommended in the further promotion and application of next generation sequencing technology. The results of our researches will provide useful and comprehensive guidelines for personal or organizational researchers in reliable and consistent variants identification.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers
    Jiayun Chen
    Xingsong Li
    Hongbin Zhong
    Yuhuan Meng
    Hongli Du
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 9
  • [2] Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines of target genome sequencing cross multiple next-generation sequencers
    Feng, Baosheng
    Lai, Juan
    Fan, Xue
    Liu, Yongfeng
    Wang, Miao
    Wu, Ping
    Zhou, Zhiliang
    Yan, Qin
    Sun, Lei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2024, 14
  • [3] Validation and assessment of variant calling pipelines for next-generation sequencing
    Pirooznia, Mehdi
    Kramer, Melissa
    Parla, Jennifer
    Goes, Fernando S.
    Potash, James B.
    McCombie, W. Richard
    Zandi, Peter P.
    [J]. HUMAN GENOMICS, 2014, 8 : 14
  • [4] Validation and assessment of variant calling pipelines for next-generation sequencing
    Mehdi Pirooznia
    Melissa Kramer
    Jennifer Parla
    Fernando S Goes
    James B Potash
    W Richard McCombie
    Peter P Zandi
    [J]. Human Genomics, 8
  • [5] Methodical comparison of variant calling pipelines for next generation sequencing data
    Bobbili, D. R.
    Sturm, M.
    May, P.
    Sharma, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 : 721 - 721
  • [6] Targeted next-generation sequencing for clinical of genomic profiles of idiopathic infertile men and a comparison of variant calling pipelines
    Raicu, F.
    Coco, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 : 656 - 656
  • [7] Comparison of seven SNP calling pipelines for the next-generation sequencing data of chickens
    Liu, Jing
    Shen, Qingmiao
    Bao, Haigang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [8] Next-Generation Desktop Sequencers
    Baker, Shawn C.
    [J]. GENETIC ENGINEERING & BIOTECHNOLOGY NEWS, 2012, 32 (15): : 40 - 41
  • [9] Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers
    Glenn, Travis C.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2011, 11 (05) : 759 - 769
  • [10] Two-Stage Variant Calling Algorithm for Next-Generation Sequencing Experiments
    Germanas, Sarunas
    [J]. HUMAN HEREDITY, 2016, 81 (04) : 234 - 234