Understanding risk in forest ecosystem services: implications for effective risk management, communication and planning

被引:41
|
作者
Blennow, Kristina [1 ]
Persson, Johannes [2 ]
Wallin, Annika [3 ,4 ]
Vareman, Niklas [2 ]
Persson, Erik [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Landscape Architecture Planning & Management, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Philosophy, SE-22222 Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Cognit Sci Dept Philosophy, SE-22222 Lund, Sweden
[4] Swedish Coll Adv Study, SE-75238 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
FORESTRY | 2014年 / 87卷 / 02期
关键词
PUBLIC PREFERENCES; DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ADVICE; JUDGMENT; INFORMATION; HEURISTICS; FREQUENCY; BENEFIT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1093/forestry/cpt032
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Uncertainty, insufficient information or information of poor quality, limited cognitive capacity and time, along with value conflicts and ethical considerations, are all aspects that make risk management and risk communication difficult. This paper provides a review of different risk concepts and describes how these influence risk management, communication and planning in relation to forest ecosystem services. Based on the review and results of empirical studies, we suggest that personal assessment of risk is decisive in the management of forest ecosystem services. The results are used together with a review of different principles of the distribution of risk to propose an approach to risk communication that is effective as well as ethically sound. Knowledge of heuristics and mutual information on both beliefs and desires are important in the proposed risk communication approach. Such knowledge provides an opportunity for relevant information exchange, so that gaps in personal knowledge maps can be filled in and effective risk communication can be promoted.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 228
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implications of Public Understanding of Avian Influenza for Fostering Effective Risk Communication
    Elledge, Brenda L.
    Brand, Michael
    Regens, James L.
    Boatright, Daniel T.
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2008, 9 (04) : 54S - 59S
  • [2] Ecosystem Services in Risk Assessment and Management
    Munns, Wayne R., Jr.
    Poulsen, Veronique
    Gala, William R.
    Marshall, Stuart J.
    Rea, Anne W.
    Sorensen, Mary T.
    von Stackelbergzz, Katherine
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 (01) : 62 - 73
  • [3] A Design for Addressing Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning
    Baskent, Emin Zeki
    Borges, Jose Guilherme
    Kaspar, Jan
    Tahri, Meryem
    [J]. FORESTS, 2020, 11 (10): : 1 - 24
  • [4] Addressing disturbance risk to mountain forest ecosystem services
    Stritih, Ana
    Bebi, Peter
    Rossi, Christian
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 296
  • [5] Ecosystem services framework for pesticide risk management
    Maltby, Lorraine
    Holt, Alison
    Alix, Anne
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [6] Guidelines for risk management in forest planning - what is risk and when is risk management useful?
    Eyvindson, Kyle
    Kangas, Annika
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2018, 48 (04) : 309 - 316
  • [7] Effective communication in contaminated risk management
    Cross, Martin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2011, 164 (04) : 229 - 239
  • [8] The valuation of forest ecosystem services as a tool for management planning - A choice experiment
    Mueller, Alexandra
    Olschewski, Roland
    Unterberger, Christian
    Knoke, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 271
  • [9] Evaluation of the toolkit for risk management in forest management planning
    Mutenthaler, Daniel
    Sekot, Walter
    [J]. AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2016, 133 (04): : 251 - 286
  • [10] Assessing the Risk of Losing Forest Ecosystem Services Due to Wildfires
    Judit Lecina-Diaz
    Jordi Martínez-Vilalta
    Albert Alvarez
    Jordi Vayreda
    Javier Retana
    [J]. Ecosystems, 2021, 24 : 1687 - 1701