Why Do Some Depressed Outpatients Who Are in Remission According to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Not Consider Themselves to Be in Remission?

被引:71
|
作者
Zimmerman, Mark
Martinez, Jennifer A.
Attiullah, Naureen
Friedman, Michael
Toba, Cristina
Boerescu, Daniela A.
Rahgeb, Moataz
机构
[1] Rhode Isl Hosp, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Brown Med Sch, Providence, RI USA
[2] Rhode Isl Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Providence, RI USA
关键词
STAR-ASTERISK-D; MAJOR DEPRESSION; SYMPTOMATOLOGY QIDS; RESIDUAL SYMPTOMS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; QUICK INVENTORY; TERM OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; DISORDER; RELAPSE;
D O I
10.4088/JCP.11m07203
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: In treatment studies of depression, remission is typically defined narrowly, based on scores on symptom severity scales. Patients treated in clinical practice, however, define the concept of remission more broadly and consider functional status, coping ability, and life satisfaction as important indicators of remission status. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project, we examined how many depressed patients in ongoing treatment who scored in the remission range on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HDRS) did not consider themselves to be in remission from their depression. Among the HDRS remitters, we compared the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who did and did not consider themselves to be in remission. Method: From March 2009 to July 2010, we interviewed 274 psychiatric outpatients diagnosed with DSM-IV major depressive disorder who were in ongoing treatment. The patients completed measures of depressive and anxious symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life. Results: Approximately one-half of the patients scoring 7 and below on the HDRS (77 of 140 patients for whom self-reported remission status was available) did not consider themselves to be in remission. The self-described remitters had significantly lower levels of depression and anxiety than the patients who did not consider themselves to be in remission (P < .001). Compared to patients who did not consider themselves to be in remission, the remitters reported significantly better quality of life (P < .001) and less functional impairment due to depression (P < .001). Remitters were significantly less likely to report dissatisfaction in their mental health (P < .01), had higher positive mental health scores (P < .001), and reported better coping ability (P < .001). Conclusions: Some patients who meet symptom-based definitions of remission nonetheless experience low levels of symptoms or functional impairment or deficits in coping ability, thereby warranting a modification in treatment. The findings raise caution in relying exclusively on symptom-based definitions of remission to guide treatment decision-making in clinical practice. J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73(6):790-795 (c) Copyright 2012 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 795
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] WHY DO SOME DEPRESSED OUTPATIENTS WHO ARE NOT IN REMISSION ACCORDING TO THE HAMILTON DEPRESSION RATING SCALE NONETHELESS CONSIDER THEMSELVES TO BE IN REMISSION?
    Zimmerman, Mark
    Martinez, Jennifer
    Attiullah, Naureen
    Friedman, Michael
    Toba, Cristina
    Boerescu, Daniela A.
    [J]. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2012, 29 (10) : 891 - 895
  • [2] Symptom differences between depressed outpatients who are in remission according to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale who do and do not consider themselves to be in remission
    Zimmerman, Mark
    Martinez, Jennifer
    Attiullah, Naureen
    Friedman, Michael
    Toba, Cristina
    Boerescu, Daniela A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2012, 142 (1-3) : 77 - 81
  • [3] Differences between minimally depressed patients who do and do not consider themselves to be in remission
    Zimmerman, M
    McGlinchey, JB
    Posternak, MA
    Friedman, M
    Boerescu, D
    Attiullah, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 66 (09) : 1134 - 1138
  • [4] Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression
    Zimmerman, M
    Posternak, MA
    Chelminski, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (06) : 577 - 582
  • [5] Is the cutoff to define remission on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression too high?
    Zimmerman, M
    Posternak, MA
    Chelminski, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2005, 193 (03) : 170 - 175
  • [6] Using a self-report depression scale to identify remission in depressed outpatients
    Zimmerman, M
    Posternak, MA
    Chelminski, I
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (10): : 1911 - 1913
  • [7] Optimal cutoff point to define remission by the Hamilton rating scale for depression according to normal social and occupational functioning
    Delgado-Cohen, H.
    Romera, I.
    Perez, V.
    Menchon, J. M.
    Polavieja, P.
    Yruretagoyena, B.
    Gilaberte, I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 11 (04) : 319 - 320
  • [8] Remission criteria for depression when using short versions of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
    Ballesteros, J
    Guemes, I
    Bobes, J
    Bulbena, A
    Luque, A
    Dal-Re, R
    Ibarra, N
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (06) : A208 - A208
  • [9] RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY AND THE HAMILTON PSYCHIATRIC RATING-SCALE FOR DEPRESSION IN DEPRESSED OUTPATIENTS
    STEER, RA
    BECK, AT
    RISKIND, JH
    BROWN, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 1987, 9 (03) : 327 - 339
  • [10] Validity of a self-report depression symptom scale for identifying remission in depressed outpatients
    Zimmerman, M
    Posternak, MA
    McGlinchey, J
    Friedman, M
    Attiullah, N
    Boerescu, D
    [J]. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 47 (03) : 185 - 188