Greenhouse gas emission intensities and economic efficiency in crop production: A systems analysis of 95 farms

被引:35
|
作者
Bonesmo, Helge [1 ]
Skjelvag, Arne Oddvar [2 ]
Janzen, H. Henry [3 ]
Klakegg, Ove [4 ]
Tveito, Ole Einar [5 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Agr Econ Res Inst, NO-7468 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, NO-1432 As, Norway
[3] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
[4] Norwegian Forest & Landscape Inst, NO-1431 As, Norway
[5] Norwegian Meteorol Inst, NO-0313 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Farm scale; Crop production; Soil C; Soil N2O; Stochastic simulation; Profitability; SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER; NORTHEASTERN COLORADO; WHEAT PRODUCTION; NITROUS-OXIDE; N2O EMISSIONS; MODEL; CARBON; VARIABILITY; NORWAY; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2012.04.001
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
To increase food production while mitigating climate change, cropping systems in the future will need to reduce greenhouse gas emission per unit of production. We conducted an analysis of 95 arable farms in Norway to calculate farm scale emissions of greenhouse gases, expressed both as CO2 eq per unit area, and CO2 eq per kg DM produced and to describe relationships between the farms' GHG intensities and heir economic efficiencies (gross margin). The study included: (1) design of a farm scale model for net GHG emission from crop production systems; (2) establishing a consistent farm scale data set for the farms with required soil, weather, and farm operation data; (3) a stochastic simulation of the variation in the sources of GHG emission intensities, and sensitivity analysis of selected parameters and equations on GHG emission intensities; and (4) describing relationships between GHG emission intensities and gross margins on farms. Among small seed and grain crops the variation in GHG emissions per kg DM was highest in oilseed (emission intensity at the 75th percentile level was 1.9 times higher than at the 25th percentile). For barley, oats, spring wheat, and winter wheat, emissions per kg DM at the 75th percentile levels were between 1.4 and 1.6 times higher than those at the 25th percentiles. Similar trends were observed for emissions per unit land area. Invariably soil N2O emission was the largest source of GHG emissions, accounting for almost half of the emissions. The second largest source was the off farm manufacturing of inputs (similar to 25%). Except for the oilseed crop, in which soil carbon (C) change contributed least, the on farm emissions due to fuel use contributed least to the total GHG intensities (similar to 10%). The soil C change contributed most to the variability in GHG emission intensities among farms in all crops, and among the sensitivity elasticities the highest one was related to environmental impacts on soil C change. The high variation in GHG intensities evident in our study implies the potential for significant mitigation of GHG emissions. The GHG emissions per kg DM (intensity) decreased with increasing gross margin in grain and oilseed crops, suggesting that crop producers have economic incentives to reduce GHG emissions. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved,
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 151
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Greenhouse gas emission intensities of grass silage based dairy and beef production: A systems analysis of Norwegian farms
    Bonesmo, Helge
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Harstad, Odd M.
    Skjelvag, Arne O.
    [J]. LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2013, 152 (2-3) : 239 - 252
  • [2] A longitudinal analysis of some Australian broadacre farms' greenhouse gas emissions, farming systems and efficiency of production
    Kingwell, Ross
    Jeanne, Rose Marie
    Hailu, Atakelty
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 146 : 120 - 128
  • [3] Greenhouse gas emission in Alberta crop production sector: Opportunities and challenge
    Zhang, M
    Malhi, SS
    Solberg, E
    Thurston, J
    Nyborg, M
    Harapiak, J
    [J]. WORLD RESOURCE REVIEW, VOL 13, NOS 2-4: GLOBAL WARMING SCIENCE & POLICY, PTS 1-3, 2001, : 555 - 568
  • [4] Economic value of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production in Iran
    Ghorbani, Mohammad
    Kulshreshtha, Suren
    Jamali, Mohsen
    [J]. BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2018, 24 (04): : 537 - 553
  • [5] ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF FIELD CROP PRODUCTION ON FAMILY FARMS IN THE AUTONOMOUS PROVINCE OF VOJVODINA
    Muncan, Petar
    Bozic, Dragica
    Bogdanov, Natalija
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2010, 57 (01): : 15 - 24
  • [6] Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Crop Production
    Strokov, A. S.
    [J]. HERALD OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2021, 91 (02) : 197 - 203
  • [7] Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Crop Production
    A. S. Strokov
    [J]. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2021, 91 : 197 - 203
  • [8] An economic analysis of production efficiency: Evidence from Irish farms
    Chavas, Jean-Paul
    Lapple, Doris
    Barham, Bradford
    Dillon, Emma
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2022, 70 (02): : 153 - 173
  • [9] Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emission abatement opportunities for an existing gas treatment plant: a comprehensive technical and economic analysis
    El-Eishy M.M.
    Abdelalim G.M.
    Aboul-Fotouh T.M.
    [J]. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 2023, 70 (01):
  • [10] Crop models for greenhouse production systems
    Challa, H
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MODELS FOR PLANT GROWTH AND CONTROL IN GREENHOUSES: MODELING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY - AGRONOMIC AND GREENHOUSE CROP MODELS, 2002, (593): : 47 - 53