Marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary native bone or grafted sinuses: a retrospective cohort study

被引:69
|
作者
Galindo-Moreno, P. [1 ,5 ]
Fernandez-Jimenez, A.
Avila-Ortiz, G. [2 ]
Silvestre, F. J. [3 ]
Hernandez-Cortes, P. [4 ]
Wang, H. L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Surg & Implant Dent, Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Dent, Dept Periodont, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Stomatol, Valencia, Spain
[4] San Cecilio Clin Hosp, Orthoped Surg Unit, Granada, Spain
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
alveolar bone loss; bone grafting; bone resorption; dental implants; maxillary sinus; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; LEVEL CHANGES; PERIODONTALLY HEALTHY; AUGMENTATION OUTCOMES; POSTERIOR MAXILLA; FLOOR ELEVATION; SURVIVAL; DISTANCE; SMOKING; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12122
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo assess differences in marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary pristine bone and implants placed following maxillary sinus augmentation over a period of 3years after functional loading. Material and methodsTwo cohorts of subjects (Group 1: Subjects who received sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement; Group 2: Subjects who underwent conventional implant placement in posterior maxillary pristine bone) were included in this retrospective study. Radiographic marginal bone loss was measured around one implant per patient on digitized panoramic radiographs that were obtained at the time of prosthesis delivery (baseline) and 12, 24, and 36months later. The influence of age, gender, smoking habits, history of periodontal disease, and type of prosthetic connection (internal or external) on marginal bone loss was analyzed in function of the type of osseous support (previously grafted or pristine). ResultsA total of 105 subjects were included in this study. Cumulative radiographic marginal bone loss ranged from 0mm to 3.9mm after 36months of functional loading. There were statistically significant differences in marginal bone loss between implants placed in grafted and pristine bone at the 12-month assessment, but not in the subsequent progression rate. External prosthetic connection, smoking, and history of periodontitis negatively influenced peri-implant bone maintenance, regardless of the type of osseous substrate. ConclusionsImplants placed in sites that received maxillary sinus augmentation exhibited more marginal bone loss than implants placed in pristine bone, although marginal bone loss mainly occurred during the first 12months after functional loading. Implants with external implant connection were strongly associated with increased marginal bone loss overtime.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 384
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Marginal Bone Loss in Implants Placed in Grafted Maxillary Sinus
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Fernandez-Jimenez, Andres
    O'Valle, Francisco
    Silvestre, Francisco J.
    Sanchez-Fernandez, Elena
    Monje, Alberto
    Catena, Andres
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (02) : 373 - 383
  • [2] Marginal Bone Loss in Implants Placed in the Maxillary Sinus Grafted With Anorganic Bovine Bone: A Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Study
    Dinato, Thiago R.
    Grossi, Marcio L.
    Teixeira, Eduardo R.
    Dinato, Jose C.
    Sczepanik, Fabio S. C.
    Gehrke, Sergio A.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 87 (08) : 880 - 887
  • [3] Influence of graft quality and marginal bone loss on implants placed in maxillary grafted sinus: a finite element study
    Inglam, Samroeng
    Suebnukarn, Siriwan
    Tharanon, Wichit
    Apatananon, Tratat
    Sitthiseripratip, Kriskrai
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2010, 48 (07) : 681 - 689
  • [4] Influence of graft quality and marginal bone loss on implants placed in maxillary grafted sinus: a finite element study
    Samroeng Inglam
    Siriwan Suebnukarn
    Wichit Tharanon
    Tratat Apatananon
    Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2010, 48 : 681 - 689
  • [5] Peri-Implant Bone Loss at Implants Placed in Preserved Alveolar Bone Versus Implants Placed in Native Bone: A Retrospective Radiographic Study
    Quoc, Johann Bui
    Vang, Aurelie
    Evrard, Laurence
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2018, 12 : 529 - 545
  • [6] Implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses are successful.
    不详
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2005, 75 (06) : 1086 - 1086
  • [7] The retrospective study of marginal bone loss around dental implants according to different autogenous bone grafts
    Kim, Tae-Yi
    Kim, Ye-Mi
    Kim, Ji-Youn
    Kim, Myung-Rae
    Kim, Sun-Jong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2011, 37 (06) : 483 - 489
  • [8] Marginal Bone Loss and Clinical Complications in Surviving Implants and Recently Placed Implants Splinted Together: A Retrospective Study
    Perlis, Vladimir
    Meidan, Zeev
    Ormianer, Zeev
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (06) : 1250 - 1255
  • [9] Early crestal bone loss around implants placed at previously failed sites compared with initially integrated implants: A retrospective cohort study
    Oh, Se-Lim
    Shiau, Harlan J.
    Ashour, Izoh
    Chen, Hegang
    Cruz, Christopher
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [10] Marginal bone resorption around dental implants placed in grafted sinuses; an up-to-30-month clinical and radiological follow-up
    Ungor, Cem
    Guven, Anil
    Songur, Timur
    Dayisoylu, Ezher
    Kurt, Hakan
    Tosun, Emre
    Senel, Figen Cizmeci
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 63 (09) : 1124 - 1128