Application of monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential models of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of metastases and myeloma in the spine-Univariate and multivariate analysis of related parameters

被引:10
|
作者
Xing, Xiaoying [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahui [1 ]
Chen, Yongye [1 ]
Zhao, Qiang [1 ]
Lang, Ning [1 ]
Yuan, Huishu [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Radiol, Hosp 3, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2020年 / 93卷 / 1112期
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
INTRAVOXEL-INCOHERENT-MOTION; CARCINOMA; MRI; MANAGEMENT; PERFUSION; RATES; BODY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20190891
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore the value of related parameters in monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential models of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating metastases and myeloma in the spine. Methods: 53 metastases and 16 myeloma patients underwent MRI with 10 b-values (O-1500 s/mm(2)). Parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), the distribution diffusion coefficient (DDC), and intravoxel water diffusion heterogeneity (alpha) from DWI were calculated. The independent sample t test and the Mann-Whiney U test were used to compare the statistical difference of the parameter values between the two. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the diagnostic efficacy. Then substituted each parameter into the decision tree model and logistic regression model, identified meaningful parameters, and evaluated their joint diagnostic performance. Results: The ADC, D. and alpha values of metastases were higher than those of myeloma, whereas the D* value was lower than that of myeloma, and the difference was significant (p < 0.05); the area under the ROC curve for the above parameters was 0.661, 0.710, 0.781, and 0.743, respectively. There was no significant difference in the f and DDC values (p > 0.05). D and a were found to conform to the decision tree model, and the accuracy of model diagnosis was 84.1%. ADC and a were found to conform to the logistic regression model, and the accuracy was 87.0%. Conclusion: The 3 models of DWI have certain values indifferentiating metastases and myeloma in spine, and the diagnostic performance of ADC, D, alpha and D* Was better. Combining ADC with a may markedly aid in the differential diagnosis of the two. Advances In knowledge: Monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential models can offer additional information in the differential diagnosis of metastases and myeloma in the spine. Decision tree model and logistic regression model are effective methods to help further distinguish the two.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Preliminary study of monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential models of diffusion-weighted MRI and diffusion kurtosis imaging on differential diagnosis of spinal metastases and chordoma
    Zhang, Jiahui
    Xing, Xiaoying
    Wang, Qizheng
    Chen, Yongye
    Yuan, Huishu
    Lang, Ning
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 31 (11) : 3130 - 3138
  • [2] Preliminary study of monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential models of diffusion-weighted MRI and diffusion kurtosis imaging on differential diagnosis of spinal metastases and chordoma
    Jiahui Zhang
    Xiaoying Xing
    Qizheng Wang
    Yongye Chen
    Huishu Yuan
    Ning Lang
    European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 3130 - 3138
  • [3] Comparison of Monoexponential, Biexponential, Stretched-Exponential, and Kurtosis Models of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Renal Solid Masses
    Zhang, Jianjian
    Suo, Shiteng
    Liu, Guiqin
    Zhang, Shan
    Zhao, Zizhou
    Xu, Jianrong
    Wu, Guangyu
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 20 (05) : 791 - 800
  • [5] Monoexponential, Biexponential, and stretched-exponential models using diffusion-weighted imaging: A quantitative differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0T
    Jin, Ya-Nan
    Zhang, Yan
    Cheng, Jing-Liang
    Zheng, Dan-Dan
    Hu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (05) : 1461 - 1467
  • [6] Grading and proliferation assessment of diffuse astrocytic tumors with monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging
    Zhang, Ju
    Chen, Xiaowei
    Chen, Dong
    Wang, Zhenxiong
    Li, Shihui
    Zhu, Wenzhen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 109 : 188 - 195
  • [7] Characterization of focal liver lesions using the stretched exponential model: comparison with monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Kim, Hyung Cheol
    Seo, Nieun
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (09) : 5111 - 5120
  • [8] Characterization of focal liver lesions using the stretched exponential model: comparison with monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Hyung Cheol Kim
    Nieun Seo
    Yong Eun Chung
    Mi-Suk Park
    Jin-Young Choi
    Myeong-Jin Kim
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 5111 - 5120
  • [9] Monoexponential, biexponential, stretched-exponential and kurtosis models of diffusion-weighted imaging in kidney assessment: comparison between patients with primary aldosteronism and healthy controls
    Wen, Deying
    Xu, Chenxiao
    Deng, Liping
    Yan, Weijie
    Peng, Pengfei
    Yue, Xun
    Tang, Lu
    Wu, Xi
    Chen, Tao
    Ren, Yan
    Sun, Jiayu
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (04) : 1340 - 1349
  • [10] Monoexponential, biexponential, stretched exponential and diffusion kurtosis models of diffusion-weighted imaging: a quantitative differentiation of solitary pulmonary lesion
    Wang, Ke
    Wu, Guangyao
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01):