An improved method for microseismic source location based on grid search

被引:8
|
作者
Tan Yu-Yang [1 ,2 ]
Li Luo-Lan [3 ]
Zhang Xin [2 ]
He Chuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Earth & Space Sci, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Sch Earth & Space Sci, Inst Oil & Gas, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] SINOPEC, Petr Explorat & Prod Res Inst, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Microseismic; Source location; Polarization attribute; Objective function; Grid search; MICROEARTHQUAKE LOCATION; INVERSION;
D O I
10.6038/cjg20170124
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Microseismic source location is the core problem for microseismic monitoring. As for the downhole monitoring cases, microseismic sources are normally located by minimizing the misfit between the observed and predicted travel times. Conventional method tends to be affected by many factors, such as ambient noises, arrival picking errors and velocity model errors, therefore produces results with larger discrepancies. We propose an improved method for microseismic source location. This method is based on grid search algorithm and some improvements are incorporated to enhance its location accuracy. The improvements include the use of a probability distribution function, which is calculated using the polarization attributes of P-wave, to estimate the source azimuth and the adoption of a new objective function and an improved search algorithm to find the optimal radial distance and depth of the source. The results from testing the proposed method on synthetic and real datasets have shown that this method has a strong noise resistibility and can produce more accurate estimate of the source azimuth. The new objective function shows better convergence than the traditional ones and its location results are less affected by the errors in the arrival times and velocity models. The improved search algorithm can mitigate the impact of erroneous picks on the location results.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 304
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Bardainne T., 2009, SEG TECHNICAL PROGRA, P1547
  • [2] Testing the ability of surface arrays to monitor microseismic activity
    Chambers, Kit
    Kendall, J. -Michael
    Brandsberg-Dahl, Sverre
    Rueda, Jose
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2010, 58 (05) : 817 - 826
  • [3] Reservoir characterization using surface microseismic monitoring
    Duncan, Peter M.
    Eisner, Leo
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 75 (05) : A139 - A146
  • [4] Eisner Leo, 2009, Leading Edge, V28, P648, DOI 10.1190/1.3148403
  • [5] Flinn E.A., 1965, Proceedings of the IEEE, V53, P1874, DOI [10.1109/proc.1965.4462, DOI 10.1109/PROC.1965.4462]
  • [6] Hypocentre determination offshore of eastern Taiwan using the Maximum Intersection method
    Font, Y
    Kao, H
    Lallemand, S
    Liu, CS
    Chiao, LY
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 158 (02) : 655 - 675
  • [7] Locating microseismic events using borehole data
    Jones, G. A.
    Kendall, J. -M.
    Bastow, I. D.
    Raymer, D. G.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2014, 62 (01) : 34 - 49
  • [8] Improved microseismic event location by inclusion of a priori dip particle motion: a case study from Ekofisk
    Jones, G. A.
    Raymer, D.
    Chambers, K.
    Kendall, J. -M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2010, 58 (05) : 727 - 737
  • [9] Maxwell S., 2009, CSEG Recorder, V34, P41
  • [10] ENHANCEMENT OF TELESEISMIC BODY PHASES WITH A POLARIZATION FILTER
    MONTALBETTI, JF
    KANASEWICH, ER
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1970, 21 (02): : 119 - +