The efficacy of azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:95
|
作者
Kong, Fabian Yuh Shiong [1 ]
Tabrizi, Sepehr N. [2 ,3 ]
Fairley, Christopher Kincaid [4 ,5 ]
Vodstrcil, Lenka A. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Huston, Wilhelmina M. [6 ]
Chen, Marcus [5 ]
Bradshaw, Catriona [5 ]
Hocking, Jane S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] Royal Womens Hosp, Dept Microbiol & Infect Dis, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[5] Melbourne Sexual Hlth Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[6] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Biomed Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
rectal chlamydia; meta-analysis; treatment efficacy; azithromycin; doxycycline; SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS; TRACHOMATIS INFECTION; NEISSERIA-GONORRHOEAE; MEN; HIV; TRANSMISSION; PREVALENCE; SEX; MANAGEMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dku574
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: There are increasing concerns about treatment failure following treatment for rectal chlamydia with 1 g of azithromycin. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy of 1 g of azithromycin as a single dose or 100 mg of doxycycline twice daily for 7 days for the treatment of rectal chlamydia. Methods: Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Register and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to the end of April 2014. Studies using 1 g of azithromycin or 7 days of doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia were eligible. Gender, diagnostic test, serovar, symptomatic status, other sexually transmitted infections, follow-up time, attrition and microbial cure were extracted. Meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled (i) azithromycin and doxycycline efficacy and (ii) efficacy difference. Results: All eight included studies were observational. The random-effects pooled efficacy for azithromycin (based on eight studies) was 82.9% (95% CI 76.0%-89.8%; I-2 = 71.0%; P<0.01) and for doxycycline (based on five studies) was 99.6% (95% CI 98.6%-100%; I-2 = 0%; P = 0.571), resulting in a random-effects pooled efficacy difference (based on five studies) of 19.9% (95% CI 11.4%-28.3%; I-2 = 48.5%; P = 0.101) in favour of doxycycline. Conclusions: The efficacy of single-dose azithromycin may be considerably lower than 1 week of doxycycline for treating rectal chlamydia. However, the available evidence is very poor. Robust randomized controlled trials are urgently required.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1297
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of doxycycline versus azithromycin for the treatment of rectal chlamydia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Liang-Fu
    Wang, Ting-Cheng
    Chen, Fu-Lun
    Hsu, Shih-Chang
    Hsu, Chin-Wang
    Bai, Chyi-Huey
    Hsu, Yuan-Pin
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 76 (12) : 3103 - 3110
  • [2] Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline for the Treatment of Genital Chlamydia Infection: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kong, F. Y. S.
    Tabrizi, S. N.
    Law, M.
    Vodstrcil, L. A.
    Chen, M.
    Fairley, C. K.
    Guy, R.
    Bradshaw, C.
    Hocking, J. S.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 59 (02) : 193 - 205
  • [3] AZITHROMYCIN VERSUS DOXYCYCLINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF GENITAL CHLAMYDIA INFECTION - A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Hocking, J.
    Kong, F.
    Vodstrcil, L.
    Guy, R.
    Chen, M.
    Fairley, C.
    Bradshaw, C.
    Tabrizi, S.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2013, 89 : A30 - A30
  • [4] Treatment for Chlamydia Infection - Doxycycline versus Azithromycin
    Quinn, Thomas C.
    Gaydos, Charlotte A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (26): : 2573 - 2575
  • [5] The Efficacy of Azithromycin for the Treatment of Genital Mycoplasma genitalium: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lau, Andrew
    Bradshaw, Catriona S.
    Lewis, Dyani
    Fairley, Christopher K.
    Chen, Marcus Y.
    Kong, Fabian Y. S.
    Hocking, Jane S.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 61 (09) : 1389 - 1399
  • [6] The efficacy and safety of azithromycin in treatment for childhood asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pan, Xiangcheng
    Liu, Yan
    Luo, Jiefeng
    Li, Siyu
    Diao, Sha
    Li, Hailong
    Huang, Liang
    Jia, Zhijun
    Chen, Lina
    Cheng, Guo
    Liu, Hanmin
    Zhang, Lingli
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2022, 57 (03) : 631 - 639
  • [7] Comparison of doxycycline with azithromycin in treatment of pharyngeal chlamydia infection
    Manavi, K.
    Hettiarachchi, N.
    Hodson, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2016, 27 (14) : 1303 - 1308
  • [8] Oral Azithromycin versus Oral Doxycycline in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bukhari, Ziad M.
    Alsudais, Ali S.
    Bshnaq, Abdullatif Ghazi
    Alshabri, Meshari
    Alqurashi, Ahmed Ruwaybih
    Alghamdi, Amer M.
    Alshehri, Omar A.
    Bashrahil, Bader
    Alghamdi, Saeed
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 18 : 3353 - 3363
  • [9] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Azithromycin Versus Moxifloxacin for the Initial Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium Infection
    Kato, Hideo
    Hagihara, Mao
    Asai, Nobuhiro
    Hirai, Jun
    Yamagishi, Yuka
    Iwamoto, Takuya
    Mikamo, Hiroshige
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (03):
  • [10] Efficacy and Safety of Azithromycin for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mangkuliguna, B. M. Ghea
    Glenardi, B. M.
    Natalia, B. M.
    Pramono, Laurentius A.
    TUBERCULOSIS AND RESPIRATORY DISEASES, 2021, 84 (04) : 299 - 316