One size does not fit all: How construal fit determines the effectiveness of organizational brand communication

被引:4
|
作者
Herhausen, Dennis [1 ]
Henkel, Sven [2 ]
Kipfelsberger, Petra [3 ]
机构
[1] KEDGE Business Sch, F-13009 Marseille, France
[2] EBS Business Sch, Mkt Dept, Oestrich Winkel, Germany
[3] Univ St Gallen, Inst Leadership & Human Resource Management, St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
Organizational brand communication; distance to headquarters; construal fit; internal marketing; multiple methods research; LEVEL THEORY; IDENTIFICATION; LEADERSHIP; BEHAVIORS; MANAGEMENT; LANGUAGE; IDENTITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/2340944420966924
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While increasing the organizational identification of employees has been described as the ultimate goal of internal marketing and internal branding, one of its most common practices is to communicate organizational values both internally and externally. However, very little is known about the relative effectiveness of different types of organizational brand communication. Drawing from construal level theory, this research investigates whether the degree of construal fit, defined as the extent to which the construal of communication matches an employee's construal of headquarters, determines the relative impact of organizational brand communication. A series of studies consisting of two cross-industrial multilevel field studies and a lab experiment provide evidence that organizational brand communication with low-level (high-level) construal is more effective to target employees with low (high) social distance to headquarters. These findings suggest that construal fit qualifies the effectiveness of organizational communication. JEL CLASSIFICATION: M3 Marketing and Advertising
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 318
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] „One size does not fit all“One size does not fit all
    S. Bercker
    S. Laudi
    S. N. Stehr
    [J]. Der Anaesthesist, 2017, 66 (10) : 735 - 736
  • [2] Comparative effectiveness research: does one size fit all?
    Kunz, Lauren M.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    Normand, Sharon-Lise T.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (25) : 3062 - 3065
  • [3] One size does not fit all
    Elliot, Alan
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, 2007, 44 (11): : 39 - 41
  • [4] One size does not fit all
    Lovly, Christine M.
    Carbone, David P.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 8 (02) : 68 - 70
  • [5] DOES ONE SIZE FIT ALL?
    Duarte, J.
    Beaufils, A. F.
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2019), 2019, : 8079 - 8086
  • [6] One size does not fit all
    Kardan, M
    [J]. ADHESIVES AGE, 2000, 43 (09): : 33 - +
  • [7] Does One Size Fit All?
    Kemna, Michael J.
    Tervaert, Jan Willem Cohen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 40 (11) : 1781 - 1784
  • [8] One size does not fit all
    Stage, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2001, 99 (03) : 43 - 44
  • [9] One size does fit all
    Katy Taylor
    [J]. Nature Medicine, 2009, 15 : 485 - 485
  • [10] One size does not fit all ...
    Ager, D
    [J]. CHIMICA OGGI-CHEMISTRY TODAY, 1998, 16 (05) : 34 - 34