Increased composite maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with ultrasonographically suspected fetal macrosomia

被引:68
|
作者
King, Jennifer R. [1 ]
Korst, Lisa M. [1 ]
Miller, David A. [1 ]
Ouzounian, Joseph G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
来源
关键词
Estimated fetal weight; macrosomia; obstetrical morbidity; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; WEIGHT ESTIMATION; PREGNANCY; ACCURACY; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2012.674990
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the composite risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity in pregnancies with suspected fetal macrosomia. Methods: In a retrospective study of laboring women delivering singleton, term neonates, we defined 3 groups of patients by estimated fetal weight (EFW) in grams, using ultrasound: (1) <4000, (2) 4000-4499, and (3) 4500+, and tested them for association with a composite outcome using multivariable logistic regression models. The measure of composite morbidity included: shoulder dystocia, third/fourth degree perineal laceration, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal length of stay (LOS) >= 5 days, neonatal birth trauma, meconium aspiration syndrome, perinatal infection, and neonatal LOS >= 5 days. Because of potential interactions between diabetes and birthweight, women with maternal diabetes were examined separately. Results: Of 8,843 deliveries, the proportion with composite morbidity by group was: (1): 26.2%, (2): 41.2%, and (3): 63.6% (p < 0.0001). The OR (95% CI) for groups (2) and (3) were: 1.9 (1.2-2.9) and 2.1 (0.6-7.2), for diabetics (9.7% of the final study population), and 2.3 (1.9-2.7) and 3.9 (2.2-6.9), for non-diabetics. Conclusions: Suspected fetal macrosomia appeared associated with increased risk for a composite measure of childbirth morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:1953 / 1959
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Increased maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with suspected fetal macrosomia
    King, Jennifer
    Korst, Lisa
    Miller, David
    Ouzounian, Joseph
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S67 - S68
  • [2] MACROSOMIA - MATERNAL, FETAL AND NEONATAL IMPLICATIONS
    MODANLOU, HD
    DORCHESTER, WL
    THOROSIAN, A
    FREEMAN, RK
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 28 (01): : A124 - A124
  • [3] MACROSOMIA - MATERNAL, FETAL, AND NEONATAL IMPLICATIONS
    MODANLOU, HD
    DORCHESTER, WL
    THOROSIAN, A
    FREEMAN, RK
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 55 (04): : 420 - 424
  • [4] Fetal growth restriction: composite maternal and neonatal morbidity
    Mendez-Figueroa, Hector
    Maggio, Lindsay
    Dahlke, Joshua
    Albright, Catherine
    Ayala, Nina
    Chauhan, Suneet
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S75 - S75
  • [5] The maternal and neonatal complications associated with macrosomia
    Khalil, A.
    Kostiv, V
    Ahmed, H.
    Beta, J.
    Akolekar, R.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 98 - 98
  • [6] Maternal factors associated with fetal macrosomia
    Liu, Chia-Hao
    Yang, Szu-Ting
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 86 (05) : 455 - 456
  • [7] Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: cohort study
    Beta, J.
    Khan, N.
    Fiolna, M.
    Khalil, A.
    Ramadan, G.
    Akolekar, R.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 54 (03) : 319 - 325
  • [8] Fetal and neonatal atrial arrhythmias: an association with maternal diabetes and neonatal macrosomia
    Pike, J. I.
    Krishnan, A.
    Kaltman, J.
    Donofrio, M. T.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 33 (12) : 1152 - 1157
  • [9] Maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality
    Adair, FL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1935, 29 : 384 - 394
  • [10] Nontypable Haemophilus Placental Cultures Are Associated with Maternal, Fetal, And Neonatal Morbidity
    Ramesh, Praveen
    Schaefer, R.
    Megli, Christina
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (02) : 321 - 321