Extinction and the US Endangered Species Act

被引:23
|
作者
Greenwald, Noah [1 ]
Suckling, Kieran F. [2 ]
Hartl, Brett [3 ]
Mehrhoff, Loyal A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Biol Divers, Portland, OR 97211 USA
[2] Ctr Biol Divers, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Ctr Biol Divers, Washington, DC USA
[4] Ctr Biol Divers, Honolulu, HI USA
来源
PEERJ | 2019年 / 7卷
关键词
Endangered species; Extinction; US Endangered Species Act; Species recovery; PROGRESS; LIST;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.6803
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The U.S. Endangered Species Act is one of the strongest laws of any nation for preventing species extinction, but quantifying the Act's effectiveness has proven difficult. To provide one measure of effectiveness, we identified listed species that have gone extinct and used previously developed methods to update an estimate of the number of species extinctions prevented by the Act. To date, only four species have been confirmed extinct with another 22 possibly extinct following protection. Another 71 listed species are extinct or possibly extinct, but were last seen before protections were enacted, meaning the Act's protections never had the opportunity to save these species. In contrast, a total of 39 species have been fully recovered, including 23 in the last 10 years. We estimate the Endangered Species Act has prevented the extinction of roughly 291 species since passage in 1973, and has to date saved more than 99% of species under its protection.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Consistent Extinction Risk Assessment under the US Endangered Species Act
    Boyd, Charlotte
    DeMaster, Douglas P.
    Waples, Robin S.
    Ward, Eric J.
    Taylor, Barbara L.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (03): : 328 - 336
  • [2] THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT - FACING EXTINCTION
    CAMPBELL, FT
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 24 (05): : 6 - &
  • [3] Evaluation of Two Approaches to Defining Extinction Risk under the US Endangered Species Act
    Thompson, Grant G.
    Maguire, Lynn A.
    Regan, Tracey J.
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (05) : 1009 - 1035
  • [4] Citizen Involvement in the US Endangered Species Act
    Brosi, Berry J.
    Biber, Eric G. N.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2012, 337 (6096) : 802 - 803
  • [5] The US Endangered Species Act and acceptable risk
    Wilhere, George F.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 297
  • [6] Geography and Recovery under the US Endangered Species Act
    Carroll, Carlos
    Vucetich, John A.
    Nelson, Michael P.
    Rohlf, Daniel J.
    Phillips, Michael K.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) : 395 - 403
  • [7] Assisted colonization under the US Endangered Species Act
    Shirey, Patrick D.
    Lamberti, Gary A.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (01): : 45 - 52
  • [8] Testing Decision Rules for Categorizing Species' Extinction Risk to Help Develop Quantitative Listing Criteria for the US Endangered Species Act
    Regan, Tracey J.
    Taylor, Barbara L.
    Thompson, Grant G.
    Cochrane, Jean Fitts
    Ralls, Katherine
    Runge, Michael C.
    Merrick, Richard
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2013, 27 (04) : 821 - 831
  • [9] Genetic data and the listing of species under the US endangered species act
    Fallon, Sylvia M.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (05) : 1186 - 1195
  • [10] The potential listing of Acropora species under the US Endangered Species Act
    Precht, WF
    Robbart, ML
    Aronson, RB
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2004, 49 (7-8) : 534 - 536