Comparison of polysaccharide fouling in forward osmosis and reverse osmosis separations

被引:44
|
作者
Xie, Zhangwang [1 ]
Nagaraja, Nagaveena [1 ]
Skillman, Lucy [1 ]
Li, Dan [1 ]
Ho, Goen [1 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Sch Engn & Informat Technol, Chem & Met Engn & Chem, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
关键词
Forward osmosis; Reverse osmosis; Polysaccharide; Fouling; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES; DRIVEN MEMBRANE PROCESSES; FILM COMPOSITE POLYAMIDE; AMMONIA-CARBON DIOXIDE; WASTE-WATER EFFLUENT; SOLUTION CHEMISTRY; ORGANIC-MATTER; LIMITING FLUX; NF MEMBRANES; HUMIC-ACID;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2016.10.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) have been recognized as significant contributors to membrane biofouling. This study compared membrane fouling by different commercially available polysaccharides (alginate, a commonly used model, as well as xanthan and pullulan) and polysaccharides isolated from naturally adherent marine bacteria (RSW 8, RSW 12, RSW 14 and FSW 6) in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). In FO experiments, a new approach was developed to maintain stable osmotic pressure by continuously saturating the sodium chloride draw solution, enabling a direct comparison of fouling in FO and RO. Under identical operating conditions and feed water chemistry, commercial polysaccharides and naturally produced polysaccharides fouled the membrane to different extents. For commercial polysaccharides, alginate and xanthan caused more severe fouling in RO than in FO; while pullulan caused minimal fouling in both processes. In FO, the extent of fouling by three polysaccharides followed the order of xanthan > alginate > pullulan. This could be explained by increased feed solution viscosity following the addition of selected commercial polysaccharides and thus varied accumulation of polysaccharide on the membrane. In RO, alginate caused the most severe fouling likely due to the formation of gels in the presence of calcium. By contrast, pullulan which lacks carboxyl functional groups was negligibly affected by calcium and caused minimal fouling. The polysaccharides naturally produced by marine bacteria (FSW 6, RSW 8 and RSW 14) improved permeate flux in FO rather than fouling. This indicated some polysaccharides could improve membrane performance. However, in RO the naturally produced polysaccharides only RSW 14 did not reduce permeate flux but RSW 12 and RSW 8 did cause significant flux decline or fouling. This study highlights the importance of selecting representative polysaccharide models for fouling research. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 184
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reverse osmosis and forward osmosis fouling: a comparison
    Robert W. Field
    Qianhong She
    Farrukh Arsalan Siddiqui
    Anthony G. Fane
    [J]. Discover Chemical Engineering, 1 (1):
  • [2] Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO)
    Lee, Sangyoup
    Boo, Chanhee
    Elimelech, Menachem
    Hong, Seungkwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2010, 365 (1-2) : 34 - 39
  • [3] Comparison of fouling propensity between reverse osmosis, forward osmosis, and membrane distillation
    Tow, Emily W.
    Warsinger, David M.
    Trueworthy, Ali M.
    Swaminathan, Jaichander
    Thiel, Gregory P.
    Zubair, Syed M.
    Myerson, Allan S.
    Lienhard, John H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2018, 556 : 352 - 364
  • [4] Exploring the differences between forward osmosis and reverse osmosis fouling
    Siddiqui, Farrukh Arsalan
    She, Qianhong
    Fane, Anthony G.
    Field, Robert W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2018, 565 : 241 - 253
  • [5] Role of pressure in organic fouling in forward osmosis and reverse osmosis
    Xie, Ming
    Lee, Jongho
    Nghiem, Long D.
    Elimelech, Menachem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2015, 493 : 748 - 754
  • [6] Comparison of fouling propensity and physical cleaning effect in forward osmosis, reverse osmosis, and membrane distillation
    Jang, Yongsun
    Cho, Hyeongrak
    Shin, Yonghyun
    Choi, Yongjun
    Lee, Sangho
    Koo, Jaewuk
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (01) : 24532 - 24541
  • [7] In situ visualization of organic fouling and cleaning mechanisms in reverse osmosis and forward osmosis
    Tow, Emily W.
    Rencken, Martin M.
    Lienhard, John H., V
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2016, 399 : 138 - 147
  • [8] Comparison between Forward Osmosis-Reverse Osmosis and Reverse Osmosis processes for seawater desalination
    Altaee, Ali
    Zaragoza, Guillermo
    van Tonningen, H. Rost
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2014, 336 : 50 - 57
  • [9] Comparison of Fouling Behavior in Cellulose Triacetate Membranes Applied in Forward and Reverse Osmosis
    Chiao, Yu-Hsuan
    Nakagawa, Keizo
    Matsuba, Mayu
    Okamoto, Masanao
    Shintani, Takuji
    Sasaki, Yuji
    Yoshioka, Tomohisa
    Kamio, Eiji
    Wickramasinghe, S. Ranil
    Matsuyama, Hideto
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2022, 61 (41) : 15345 - 15354
  • [10] Boron transport in forward osmosis: Measurements, mechanisms, and comparison with reverse osmosis
    Kim, Changwoo
    Lee, Sangyoup
    Shon, Ho Kyong
    Elimelech, Menachem
    Hong, Seungkwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2012, 419 : 42 - 48