NON-RESPONSE IN FACE-TO-FACE SURVEYS IN SPAIN

被引：4
|
作者：
Diaz de Rada, Vidal [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Publ Navarra, Dept Sociol, Navarra, Spain
来源：
REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE SOCIOLOGIA | 2013年 / 71卷 / 02期
关键词：
Face-to-Face Surveys; Survey Cooperation; Unit Non-Response; Representativeness; RESPONSE RATE; RATES; QUESTIONNAIRES; METAANALYSIS; IMPACT; BIAS;
D O I：
10.3989/ris.2012.02.07
中图分类号：
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号：
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要：
The gradual decline of cooperation in surveys jeopardises the viability of this tool in the future, despite it being one of the most useful in gaining knowledge of society. Since the last decade of the 20th century, substantial, in-depth research has been conducted into this social phenomenon, whilst at the same time there has been further "transparency" in the data collection process, as documents are disseminated which describe in detail the "events" that occurred during field work. This paper analyses the lack of response in face-to-face surveys conducted in Spain, considering not only those selecting interviewees by using random route and quotas, but also those using administrative documents, such as the population census. It concludes by providing a number of proven, efficient strategies for counteracting the effects of non-response.
引用
收藏
页码：357 / 381
页数：25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bystanders and response bias in face-to-face surveys in Africa
    Zimbalist, Zack
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 25 (03) : 361 - 377
  • [2] RESPONSE RATES AND RESPONSE CONTENT IN MAIL VERSUS FACE-TO-FACE SURVEYS
    KRYSAN, M
    SCHUMAN, H
    SCOTT, LJ
    BEATTY, P
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1994, 58 (03) : 381 - 399
  • [3] Non-response to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-to-face modes
    Chittleborough, Catherine R.
    Taylor, Anne W.
    Baum, Fran E.
    Hiller, Janet E.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [4] Non-response to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-to-face modes
    Catherine R Chittleborough
    Anne W Taylor
    Fran E Baum
    Janet E Hiller
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8
  • [5] Comparing acquiescent and extreme response styles in face-to-face and web surveys
    Liu, Mingnan
    Conrad, Frederick G.
    Lee, Sunghee
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2017, 51 (02) : 941 - 958
  • [6] THE INTERVIEWER CONTRIBUTION TO VARIABILITY IN RESPONSE TIMES IN FACE-TO-FACE INTERVIEW SURVEYS
    Sturgis, Patrick
    Maslovskaya, Olga
    Durrant, Gabriele
    Brunton-Smith, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2021, 9 (04) : 701 - 721
  • [7] Comparing acquiescent and extreme response styles in face-to-face and web surveys
    Mingnan Liu
    Frederick G. Conrad
    Sunghee Lee
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2017, 51 : 941 - 958
  • [8] JOINT USE OF FACE-TO-FACE AND TELEPHONE SURVEYS IN ELECTORAL SURVEYS
    Diaz de Rada, Vidal
    [J]. REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE SOCIOLOGIA, 2011, 69 (02): : 393 - 416
  • [9] Going Online with a Face-to-Face Household Panel: Effects of a Mixed Mode Design on Item and Unit Non-Response
    Jaeckle, Annette
    Lynn, Peter
    Burton, Jonathan
    [J]. SURVEY RESEARCH METHODS, 2015, 9 (01): : 57 - 70
  • [10] Use of Monetary Incentives in Face-to-Face Surveys in Light of Decreasing Response Rates
    Pforr, Klaus
    Rammstedt, Beatrice
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPIE PSYCHOSOMATIK MEDIZINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 2016, 66 (07) : 280 - 282
12345