Building environmental states - Legitimacy and rationalization in sustainability governance

被引:23
|
作者
Frickel, S
Davidson, DJ
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Dept Sociol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Rural Econ, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
关键词
environmental justice; environmental politics; environmental science; environmental state; state theory; sustainability governance; synergy;
D O I
10.1177/0268580904040922
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This article explores the potential for nation-states to become substantial contributors to sustainability governance. This potential resides in the ability of nation-states to make environmental protection a basic goal, in part by committing institutional resources toward the formation and implementation of substantive actions perceived necessary for long-term environmental sustainability. Existing research suggests that nation-states undertake environmental action in order to maintain legitimacy in the face of political pressure. While the maintenance of legitimacy is necessary, we argue that a substantive state role in sustainability governance is also dependent upon the rationalization of state environmental roles. Further, rationalization can be fostered through the enrichment of embedded state-societal networks with two key actors in civil society: environmental justice movements and environmental knowledge professionals. This article develops a conceptual framework that grounds sustainability efforts in rationalization processes and examines the synergistic potential for these two social actors to help build states that institute fundamental environmental reform.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 110
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Building Legitimacy in an Era of Polycentric Trade: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance
    Langford, Natalie J.
    Fransen, Luc
    [J]. POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2022, 10 (03): : 155 - 166
  • [2] Legitimacy and sustainability of social enterprise: governance and accountability
    Zainon, Saunah
    Ahmad, Syahrul Ahmar
    Atan, Ruhaya
    Wah, Yap Bee
    Abu Bakar, Zarina
    Sarman, Siti Rahayu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT (ICGSM) 2014, 2014, 145 : 152 - 157
  • [4] From environmental governance to governance for sustainability
    Agrawal, Arun
    Brandhorst, Sidney
    Jain, Meha
    Liao, Chuan
    Pradhan, Nabin
    Solomon, Divya
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2022, 5 (06): : 615 - 621
  • [5] Environmental governance: the challenge of legitimacy and effectiveness
    Childs, John
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2013, 31 (06): : 1147 - 1148
  • [6] Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness
    Jamasb, Tooraj
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2013, 2 (01) : 98 - 100
  • [7] Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance
    Stupak, Inge
    Mansoor, Maha
    Smith, C. Tattersall
    [J]. ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [8] Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance
    Inge Stupak
    Maha Mansoor
    C. Tattersall Smith
    [J]. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 11
  • [9] Environmental Governance. The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness
    Woitrin, Pierre
    [J]. ETUDES INTERNATIONALES, 2014, 45 (02): : 322 - 324
  • [10] Organizing for Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy
    Christensen, Tom
    Laegreid, Per
    Rykkja, Lise H.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2016, 76 (06) : 887 - 897