Evaluation of the fracture resistance of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing monolithic crowns prepared in different cement thicknesses

被引:13
|
作者
Sagsoz, N. Polat [1 ]
Yanikoglu, N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Hlth Serv Vocat Sch, Dept Dent Prosthesis Technol, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey
[2] Univ Ataturk, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
Cement thickness; fracture resistance; monolithic computer-aided design; computer-aided manufacturing crowns; ALL-CERAMIC CROWNS; FATIGUE RESISTANCE; COMPOSITE RESIN; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; PREPARATION DESIGN; LAYER THICKNESS; IN-VITRO; LOAD; STRENGTH; ADHESIVE;
D O I
10.4103/njcp.njcp_137_17
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of monolithic computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) crowns that are prepared with different cement thickness. Materials and Methods: For this investigation, a human maxillary premolar tooth was selected. Master model preparation was performed with a demand bur under water spray. Master die was taken to fabricate 105 epoxy resin replicas. The crowns were milled using a CEREC 4 CAD/CAM system (Software Version, 4.2.0.57192). CAD/CAM crowns were made using resin nanoceramic, feldspathic glass ceramic, lithium disilicate, and leucite-reinforced ceramics. Each group was subdivided into three groups in accordance with three different cement thicknesses (30, 90, and 150 mm). Crowns milled out. Then RelyX U200 was used as a luting agent to bond the crowns to the prepared samples. After one hour cementations, the specimens were stored in water bath at 37 degrees C for 1 week before testing. Seven unprepared and unrestored teeth were kept and tested as a control group. A universal test machine was used to assume the fracture resistance of all specimens. The compressive load (N) that caused fracture was recorded for each specimen. Fracture resistance data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA and two-factor interaction modeling test (a = 0.001). Results: There are statistically significant differences between fracture resistances of CAD/CAM monolithic crown materials (P < 0.001). It is seen that cement thickness is not statistically significant for fracture resistance of CAD/CAM monolithic crowns (P 0.001). Conclusions: CAD/CAM monolithic crown materials affected fracture resistance. Cement thickness (30, 90, and 150 mm) was not effective on fracture resistance of CAD/CAM monolithic crowns.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 422
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fracture resistance of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns cemented on solid abutments
    Stona, Deborah
    Henrique, Luiz
    Burnett, Luiz Henrique, Jr.
    Mota, Eduardo Goncalves
    Spohr, Ana Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 146 (07): : 501 - 507
  • [2] Effect of Different Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Materials and Thicknesses on the Fracture Resistance of Occlusal Veneers
    Andrade, J. P.
    Stona, D.
    Bittencourt, H. R.
    Borges, G. A.
    Burnett Junior, L. H.
    Spohr, A. M.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 43 (05) : 539 - 548
  • [3] Fracture resistance of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing generated composite resin-based molar crowns
    Harada, Akio
    Nakamura, Keisuke
    Kanno, Taro
    Inagaki, Ryoichi
    Ortengren, Ulf
    Niwano, Yoshimi
    Sasaki, Keiichi
    Egusa, Hiroshi
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2015, 123 (02) : 122 - 129
  • [4] COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN AND COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING
    WEINBERGSTABER, M
    [J]. DU-DIE ZEITSCHRIFT DER KULTUR, 1984, (02): : 89 - 89
  • [5] In vitro Fracture Strength and Hardness of Different Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing Inlays
    Sagsoz, O.
    Yildiz, M.
    Ghahramanzadeh, Hojjat A. S. L.
    Alsaran, A.
    [J]. NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 21 (03) : 380 - 387
  • [7] Bioprinting of Multimaterials with Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing
    Lee, J. M.
    Sing, S. L.
    Yeong, W. Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOPRINTING, 2020, 6 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [8] COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN AND COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING OF FOOT ORTHOSES
    STAATS, TB
    KRIECHBAUM, MP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS, 1989, 1 (03) : 182 - 186
  • [9] Impact of resin composite cement on color of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramics
    Liebermann, Anja
    Mandl, Alicia
    Eichberger, Marlis
    Stawarczyk, Bogna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 33 (05) : 786 - 794
  • [10] To Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing or Not to Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing? Free Fibula Flap With Computer-Aided Technique for Mandibular Reconstruction
    Zavattero, Emanuele
    Garzino-Demo, Paolo
    Fasolis, Massimo
    Ramieri, Guglielmo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 26 (03) : E206 - E209