A minimax regret model for the leader-follower facility location problem

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Xiang [1 ]
Zhang, Tianyu [1 ]
Wang, Liang [2 ]
Ma, Hongguang [1 ]
Zhao, Xiande [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] China Europe Int Business Sch, 699 Hongfeng Rd, Shanghai 201206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Leader-follower facility location; Competition; Minimax regret model; Linearisation; COMPETITIVE LOCATION; DESIGN; CHOICE; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-020-03826-y
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The leader-follower facility location problem consists of a leader and a follower who are competitors that locate new facilities sequentially. Traditional studies have generally assumed that the leader has partial or full advance information of the follower's response when making a decision. However, this assumption might be invalid or impracticable in practice. In this paper, we consider that the leader needs to locate a predetermined number of new facilities without knowing anything about the follower's response. By separating the scenarios in which the follower responds with different numbers of new facilities, a minimax regret model is proposed for the leader to minimise its maximum possible loss. Based on the structural characteristics of the proposed model, a set of solving procedures is provided that transforms the follower's nonlinear (fraction) programming model into a linear model. In the numerical experiments, the proposed model is compared with two other location models, a deterministic model and a risk model, and the efficiency of the linearisation in decreasing the computation time is verified. The results show that the proposed model is more applicable to the leader when there is no information about the number or probability distribution of the follower's new facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 882
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A minimax regret model for the leader–follower facility location problem
    Xiang Li
    Tianyu Zhang
    Liang Wang
    Hongguang Ma
    Xiande Zhao
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2022, 309 : 861 - 882
  • [2] A leader-follower model for discrete competitive facility location
    Drezner, Tammy
    Drezner, Zvi
    Kalczynski, Pawel
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 64 : 51 - 59
  • [3] A robust model for a leader-follower competitive facility location problem in a discrete space
    Ashtiani, Milad Godi
    Makui, Ahmad
    Ramezanian, Reza
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2013, 37 (1-2) : 62 - 71
  • [4] The leader-follower location model
    Santos-Penate, D. R.
    Suarez-Vega, R.
    Dorta-Gonzalez, P.
    [J]. NETWORKS & SPATIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 7 (01): : 45 - 61
  • [5] A leader-follower game in competitive facility location
    Kucukaydin, Hande
    Aras, Necati
    Altinel, I. Kuban
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (02) : 437 - 448
  • [6] Alternating heuristic and exact method for the leader-follower facility location and design problem
    Kochetov, Yury
    Sokolova, Irina
    Amirgaliyeva, Saltanat
    Amirgaliyeva, Zhazira
    [J]. 2015 TWELVE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS COMPUTER AND COMPUTATION (ICECCO), 2015, : 87 - 89
  • [7] A leader-follower model for discrete competitive facility location problem under the partially proportional rule with a threshold
    Yu, Wuyang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (12):
  • [8] An exact procedure and LP formulations for the leader-follower location problem
    Campos Rodriguez, Clara M.
    Santos Penate, Dolores R.
    Moreno Perez, Jose A.
    [J]. TOP, 2010, 18 (01) : 97 - 121
  • [9] A Leader-Follower Hub Location Problem Under Fixed Markups
    Cvokic, Dimitrije D.
    Kochetov, Yury A.
    Plyasunov, Aleksandr V.
    [J]. DISCRETE OPTIMIZATION AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH, DOOR 2016, 2016, 9869 : 350 - 363
  • [10] The Existence of Equilibria in the Leader-Follower Hub Location and Pricing Problem
    Cvokic, Dimitrije D.
    Kochetov, Yury A.
    Plyasunov, Aleksandr V.
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH PROCEEDINGS 2015, 2017, : 539 - 544