The LaboRisCh algorithm, a tool for the assessing chemical risk for health: scientific uncertainty management

被引:0
|
作者
Bracci, Massimo [2 ]
Calisti, Roberto [1 ]
Strafella, Elisabetta [2 ]
Governa, Mario [2 ]
Santarelli, Lory [2 ]
机构
[1] ASUR MARCHE, Serv Prevenz & Sicurezza Negli Ambienti Lavoro, Civitanova Marche, Italy
[2] Univ Politecn Marche, Dipartimento Mol & Terapie Innovat, Fac Med & Chirurg, Ancona, Italy
来源
EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE | 2008年 / 32卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The LaboRisCh algorithm is a practical tool for the first-level assessment of the health risk from chemicals in research laboratories and similar workplaces. Through the assessment of the risk index related to each agent (R-a), the algorithm leads to the calculation of the value of a baseline risk index (R-b), and finally to a corrected risk index (R-c), The value of R-c sets the relevant condition in one of three health risk zones. The algorithm also includes carcinogens and mutagens, whose presence mandates the addition of the c/m subscript (R-c (c/m)). The addition is automatic for agents allocated the EU risk phrases R40, R45, R46, R49 and R68; whereas it is at the discretion of the evaluator for non "EU-classified", agents that belong to EU categories 1 or 2 and/or to IARC categories 1, 2A or 2B. Further research has led to integration of the algorithm. For instance, similarly to the provision for carcinogens and mutagens, the r subscript (R-cr) is now required for agents that are considered toxic to reproduction allocated or attributable to risk phrases R60, R61, R62 and R63. (Epidemiol Prev 2008; 32(6): 315-318)
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 318
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A 'Richter scale for risk'? Scientific management of uncertainty versus management of scientific uncertainty
    Adams, J
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 1998, 23 (02) : 146 - 155
  • [2] A tool to integrate scientific risk assessment principles into the management and prioritization of chemical contaminants in raw materials
    Stroheker, T.
    Scholz, G.
    Mazzatorta, P.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 295 : S143 - S144
  • [3] INCORPORATING SCIENTIFIC-INFORMATION IN CHEMICAL RISK ASSESSMENT - DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY
    CLEWELL, HJ
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1994, 207 : 59 - ENVR
  • [4] The Challenge of Scientific Uncertainty and Disunity in Risk Assessment and Management of GM Crops
    Myhr, Anne Ingeborg
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2010, 19 (01) : 7 - 31
  • [5] Assessing Human Health Risk to DNAPLs Exposure in Bayesian Uncertainty Analysis
    Pan, Y.
    Zeng, X. K.
    Gao, X. Y.
    Xu, H. X.
    Sun, Y. Y.
    Wang, D.
    Wu, J. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 39 (01) : 67 - 80
  • [6] Evaluating the benefits of uncertainty reduction in environmental health risk management
    Finkel, A.M.
    Evans, J.S.
    [J]. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1987, 37 (10): : 1164 - 1171
  • [7] Dynamics Light Scattering as a Tool for Assessing Health Status and Disease Risk
    Mishra, Ina
    Patel, Vipul
    Robinson, Michelle D.
    Gordon, Katrina
    Deodhar, Sneha
    Cistola, David P.
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 110 (03) : 476A - 476A
  • [8] Receivables Management as a Tool to Minimize Credit Risk and its Algorithm
    Siekelova, Anna
    Gregova, Elena
    [J]. 2016 ISSGBM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (ISSGBM-IB 2016), 2016, 61 : 67 - 72
  • [9] Dementia Population Risk Tool (DemPoRT): study protocol for a predictive algorithm assessing dementia risk in the community
    Fisher, Stacey
    Hsu, Amy
    Mojaverian, Nassim
    Taljaard, Monica
    Huyer, Gregory
    Manuel, Douglas G.
    Tanuseputro, Peter
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):
  • [10] EVALUATING THE BENEFITS OF UNCERTAINTY REDUCTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH RISK MANAGEMENT
    FINKEL, AM
    EVANS, JS
    [J]. JAPCA-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT, 1987, 37 (10): : 1164 - 1171