A cross-linguistic study in learning prosodic rhythms: Rules, constraints, and similarity

被引:14
|
作者
Bailey, TM
Plunkett, K
Scarpa, E
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
[2] Univ Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
artificial grammar learning; prosody; rhythm; stress;
D O I
10.1177/00238309990420010101
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Differences in the learnability of linguistic patterns may be crucial in deciding among alternative learning models. This paper compares the ability of English speakers (Experiment 1) and portuguese speakers (Experiment 2) to learn two complex rhythm patterns observed in languages with primary word stress. Subjects were familiarized with one of two rhythms during a discrimination task, followed by a recognition task which tested whether knowledge of the rhythm generalized to novel stimuli. The main findings were: (I)speakers trained on the cross-linguistically less common rhythm distinguished between novel stimuli which did or did not conform to their training rhythm, while speakers trained on the more common rhythm did not; (2) English speakers wen biased more strongly than Portuguese speakers against final stress; and (3) melodies that an on a boundary between rhythm categories were treated as less prototypical than other members of the same rhythm category. The results demonstrate that knowledge of complex linguistic rhythms can be generalized after very little training, and that the less common rhythm is easier to learn even though it seems more complex. The results are compared with general-purpose exemplar-based learning models as well as abstract linguistic theories of word stress acquisition.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 38
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning
    Han, ZhaoHong
    [J]. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2008, 30 (03) : 396 - 398
  • [2] Cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning
    Vidgren, Noora
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTILINGUALISM, 2011, 8 (02) : 151 - 153
  • [3] Cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning
    Shea, Christine
    [J]. CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW-REVUE CANADIENNE DES LANGUES VIVANTES, 2008, 64 (04): : 700 - 702
  • [4] Cross-linguistic patterns of speech prosodic differences in autism: A machine learning study
    Lau, Joseph C. Y.
    Patel, Shivani
    Kang, Xin
    Nayar, Kritika
    Martin, Gary E.
    Choy, Jason
    Wong, Patrick C. M.
    Losh, Molly
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [5] Prosodic Prominence - A Cross-Linguistic Perspective
    Grice, Martine
    Kuegler, Frank
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2021, 64 (02) : 253 - 260
  • [6] PHONETIC EXPLANATIONS FOR CROSS-LINGUISTIC PROSODIC SIMILARITIES
    VAISSIERE, J
    [J]. PHONETICA, 1995, 52 (03) : 123 - 130
  • [7] Cross-linguistic Prosodic Comparison with OMProDat Database
    Ding, Hongwei
    Hirst, Daniel
    Hoffmann, Ruediger
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ORIENTAL COCOSDA HELD JOINTLY WITH 2015 CONFERENCE ON ASIAN SPOKEN LANGUAGE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION (O-COCOSDA/CASLRE), 2015, : 212 - 215
  • [8] Cross-Linguistic Similarity Evaluation Techniques Based on Deep Learning
    Li, Jun
    Zhang, Jing
    Qian, Mengjie
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MULTIMEDIA, 2022, 2022
  • [9] FUNCTIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON SENTENCE PROCESSING - A CROSS-LINGUISTIC STUDY
    BATES, E
    MCNEW, S
    MACWHINNEY, B
    DEVESCOVI, A
    SMITH, S
    [J]. COGNITION, 1982, 11 (03) : 245 - 299
  • [10] Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Prosodic Features for Sentence Segmentation
    Fung, James G.
    Hakkani-Tur, Dilek
    Doss, Mathew Magimai
    Shriberg, Liz
    Cuendet, Sebastien
    Mirghqfori, Nikki
    [J]. INTERSPEECH 2007: 8TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 2828 - 2831