Focus on 16p13.3 Locus in Colon Cancer

被引:12
|
作者
Mampaey, Evi [1 ]
Fieuw, Annelies [2 ]
Van Laethem, Thalia [2 ]
Ferdinande, Liesbeth [3 ]
Claes, Kathleen [2 ]
Ceelen, Wim [4 ]
Van Nieuwenhove, Yves [4 ]
Pattyn, Piet [4 ]
De Man, Marc [1 ]
De Ruyck, Kim [5 ]
Van Roy, Nadine [2 ]
Geboes, Karen [1 ]
Laurent, Stephanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol Digest Oncol, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Med Genet, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Ghent, Belgium
[5] Univ Ghent, Dept Basic Med Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
TUMOR MICROSATELLITE-INSTABILITY; COPY NUMBER ALTERATIONS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; STAGE-II; INTEGRATED ANALYSIS; GENOMIC ALTERATIONS; ADJUVANT TREATMENT; IDENTIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0131421
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background With one million new cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed annually in the world, CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the Western world. Patients with stage I-III CRC can be cured with surgery but are at risk for recurrence. Colorectal cancer is characterized by the presence of chromosomal deletions and gains. Large genomic profiling studies have however not been conducted in this disease. The number of a specific genetic aberration in a tumour sample could correlate with recurrence-free survival or overall survival, possibly leading to its use as biomarker for therapeutic decisions. At this point there are not sufficient markers for prediction of disease recurrence in colorectal cancer, which can be used in the clinic to discriminate between stage II patients who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. For instance, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has been most clearly demonstrated in stage III disease with an approximately 30 percent relative reduction in the risk of disease recurrence. The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II disease are less certain, the risk for relapse is much smaller in the overall group and the specific patients at risk are hard to identify. Materials and Methods In this study, array-comparative genomic hybridization analysis (array-CGH) was applied to study high-resolution DNA copy number alterations in 93 colon carcinoma samples. These genomic data were combined with parameters like KRAS mutation status, microsatellite status and clinicopathological characteristics. Results Both large and small chromosomal losses and gains were identified in our sample cohort. Recurrent gains were found for chromosome 1q, 7, 8q, 13 and 20 and losses were mostly found for 1p, 4, 8p, 14, 15, 17p, 18, 21 and 22. Data analysis demonstrated that loss of chromosome 4 is linked to a worse prognosis in our patients series. Besides these alterations, two interesting small regions of overlap were identified, which could be associated with disease recurrence. Gain of the 16p13.3 locus (including the RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog gene, RBFOX1) was linked with a worse recurrence-free survival in our patient cohort. On the other hand, loss of RBFOX1 was only found in patients without disease recurrence. Most interestingly, above mentioned characteristics were also found in stage II patients, for whom there is a high medical need for the identification of new prognostic biomarkers. Conclusions In conclusion, copy number variation of the 16p13.3 locus seems to be an important parameter for prediction of disease recurrence in colon cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physical mapping near the alpha globin locus at 16p13.3
    Daniels, RJ
    Raynham, HA
    Harris, PC
    Higgs, DR
    CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1996, 72 (04): : 6 - 6
  • [2] CONFIRMATION OF ASSIGNMENT OF A LOCUS FOR RUBINSTEIN-TAYBI SYNDROME GENE TO 16P13.3
    LACOMBE, O
    SAURA, R
    TAINE, L
    BATTIN, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1992, 44 (01): : 126 - 128
  • [3] The relationship between monosomy for 16p13.3 and phenotype
    Horsley, SW
    Daniels, RJ
    Anguita, E
    Villegas, A
    Ayyub, H
    Buckle, VJ
    Higgs, DR
    Kearney, L
    CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1999, 85 (1-2): : 29 - 29
  • [4] The relationship between monosomy for 16p13.3 and phenotype
    Horsley, S
    Daniels, RJ
    Anguita, E
    Villegas, A
    Ayyub, H
    Buckle, VJ
    Higgs, DR
    Kearney, L
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1999, 36 : S82 - S82
  • [5] CHROMOSOME 16P13.3 - ENRICHMENT OF KIDNEY CDNAS
    LANDES, G
    PETRY, LR
    DACKOWSKI, WR
    HAKIM, R
    DOGGETT, NA
    KLINGER, KW
    CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1995, 68 (3-4): : 183 - 183
  • [6] Duplication 16p13.3 and the CREBBP gene: Confirmation of the phenotype
    Demeer, Benedicte
    Andrieux, Joris
    Receveur, Aline
    Morin, Gilles
    Petit, Florence
    Julia, Sophie
    Plessis, Ghislaine
    Martin-Coignard, Dominique
    Delobel, Bruno
    Firth, Helen V.
    Thuresson, Ann C.
    Dosen, Sandrine Lanco
    Sjoers, Kerstin
    Le Caignec, Cedric
    Devriendt, Koenraad
    Mathieu-Dramard, Michele
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2013, 56 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [7] LOCALIZATION OF HUMAN PGP AND HAGH GENES TO 16P13.3
    MULLEY, JC
    BARTON, N
    CALLEN, DF
    CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1990, 53 (2-3): : 175 - 176
  • [8] TENTATIVE ASSIGNMENT OF A LOCUS FOR RUBINSTEIN-TAYBI SYNDROME TO 16P13.3 BY A DENOVO RECIPROCAL TRANSLOCATION, T(7-16)(Q34-P13.3)
    TOMMERUP, N
    VANDERHAGEN, CB
    HEIBERG, A
    CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1991, 58 (3-4): : 2002 - 2003
  • [9] TENTATIVE ASSIGNMENT OF A LOCUS FOR RUBINSTEIN-TAYBI SYNDROME TO 16P13.3 BY A DENOVO RECIPROCAL TRANSLOCATION, T(7,16)(Q34,P13.3)
    TOMMERUP, N
    VANDERHAGEN, CB
    HEIBERG, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1992, 44 (02): : 237 - 241
  • [10] DFNB86, a novel autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness locus on chromosome 16p13.3
    Ali, R. A.
    Rehman, A. U.
    Khan, S. N.
    Husnain, T.
    Riazuddin, S.
    Friedman, T. B.
    Ahmed, Z. M.
    Riazuddin, S.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2012, 81 (05) : 498 - 500