Towards identifying unresolved discussions in student online forums

被引:11
|
作者
Kim, Jihie [1 ]
Kang, Jeon-Hyung [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Inst Informat Sci, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
On-line discussion board; Speech act; Discussion assessment; Discourse; Student Q&A forum; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10489-013-0481-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Online discussion is a popular form of web-based computer-mediated communication and is a dominant medium for cyber communities in areas of information sharing, customer support and distributed education. Automatic tools for analyzing online discussions are highly desirable for better information management and assistance. For example, a summary of student Q&A discussions or unresolved questions can help the instructor assess student dialogue efficiently, which can lead to better instructor guidance for student learning by discussion. This paper presents an approach for classifying student discussions according to a set of discourse structures, and identifying discussions with confusion or unanswered questions. Inspired by the existing spoken dialogue analysis approaches, we first define a set of forum "speech acts" (F-SAs) that represent roles that individual messages play in threaded Q&A discussions, such as questions, raising issues, and answers. We then model discourse structures in discussion threads using the F-SAs, such as whether a question was replied to with an answer. Finally, we use such discourse structures in classifying and identifying discussions with unanswered questions or unresolved issues. We performed an analysis of the discussion thread classifiers and the system showed accuracies from 0.79 to 0.87 on several discussion classification problems. This analysis of human conversation via online discussions provides a basis for development of future information extraction and intelligent assistance techniques for online discussions.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 612
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards identifying unresolved discussions in student online forums
    Jihie Kim
    Jeon-Hyung Kang
    [J]. Applied Intelligence, 2014, 40 : 601 - 612
  • [2] Identifying Unresolved Issues in Online Student Discussions: A Multi-Phase Dialogue Classification Approach
    Kim, Jihie
    Kim, Taehwan
    Li, Jia
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: BUILDING LEARNING SYSTEMS THAT CARE: FROM KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION TO AFFECTIVE MODELLING, 2009, 200 : 704 - 706
  • [3] Identifying Student Online Discussions with Unanswered Questions
    Kim, Jihie
    Li, Jia
    Kim, Taehwan
    [J]. K-CAP'09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE CAPTURE, 2009, : 195 - 196
  • [4] Towards Identifying Peer Expertise in Online Health Forums
    Reddy, Manoj
    Vydiswaran, V. G. Vinod
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS WORKSHOPS (ICHI-W), 2018, : 82 - 83
  • [5] Argumentative competences development in online discussions forums
    Guzman-Cedillo, Yunuen I.
    Flores-Macias, Rosa-del-Carmen
    Tirado-Segura, Felipe
    [J]. ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA, 2013, 29 (03): : 907 - 916
  • [6] Hyperacusis in Children: A Thematic Analysis of Discussions in Online Forums
    Potgieter, Iskra
    Hoare, Derek J.
    Fackrell, Kathryn
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2022, 31 (01) : 166 - 174
  • [7] Towards Combined Network and Text Analytics of Student Discourse in Online Discussions
    Ferreira, Rafael
    Kovanovi, Vitomir
    Gasevi, Dragan
    Rolim, Vitor
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, PART I, 2018, 10947 : 111 - 126
  • [8] Gender in student online discussions
    Bostock, SJ
    Wu, LZ
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 42 (01) : 73 - 85
  • [9] Identifying peer experts in online health forums
    Vydiswaran, V. G. Vinod
    Reddy, Manoj
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 19 (Suppl 3)
  • [10] Identifying peer experts in online health forums
    V.G.Vinod Vydiswaran
    Manoj Reddy
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19