Iterative Pseudostate Method for Transfer Trajectory Design of Interplanetary Orbiter Missions

被引:5
|
作者
Parvathi, S. P. [1 ]
Ramanan, R. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Space Sci & Technol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Trivandrum 695547, Kerala, India
关键词
ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.2514/1.G002072
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A proposed method based on the pseudostate technique identifies the four distinct transfer trajectory design options available for an opportunity with the parking orbit inclinations fixed for an interplanetary orbiter mission. Though design options differ by about 0.06 deg in the departure right ascension of ascending node and about 0.07 deg in the departure argument of periapsis, they result in completely different arrival parking orbit angles [RAAN]. Further, the numerical method cannot identify these design options without additional boundary condition on arrival hyperbola when the patched conic design is used as the initial guess. On the other hand, each of the proposed design options, when used as initial guess for numerical refinement, converges to the corresponding arrival geometry, thus generating four distinct numerical designs. The differences in the departure parking orbit angles (RAAN and AOP) and between the proposed and V-infinity tuned patched conic designs are about 0.6 and 0.3 deg, respectively, for the minimum energy opportunity of 2018. This difference is because of inclusion of the sun�s gravity within the pseudosphere in the proposed method. The proposed design reduces the deviation in target conditions. The deviation in the time of periapsis is also greatly reduced by about 95%. The designs obtained using the proposed method are very close to the numerical designs. Also, the computation time taken by the proposed method to generate designs for departure epochs spanning one year is 0.1 s, which is comparable to the 0.08 s taken by the V-infinity tuned patched conic method.
引用
收藏
页码:2794 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Direct transfer trajectory design options for interplanetary orbiter missions using an iterative patched conic method
    Parvathi, S. P.
    Ramanan, R. V.
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2017, 59 (07) : 1763 - 1774
  • [2] MULTIPLE DESIGN OPTIONS FOR INTERPLANETARY ORBITER MISSIONS USING PSEUDOSTATE TECHNIQUE
    Parvathi, S. P.
    Ramanan, R. V.
    SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2016, PTS I-IV, 2016, 158 : 1275 - 1292
  • [3] Pseudostate theory based iterative preliminary design method for powered gravity-assist interplanetary trajectories
    Yang, Bin
    Yang, Hongwei
    Li, Shuang
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2019, 165 : 139 - 149
  • [4] Reinforcement Learning for Robust Trajectory Design of Interplanetary Missions
    Zavoli, Alessandro
    Federici, Lorenzo
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2021, 44 (08) : 1440 - 1453
  • [5] A direct trajectory optimization method for constrained interplanetary missions
    Kluever, CA
    Cupples, ML
    Kirchmyer, RH
    SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 1999, VOL 102, PTS I AND II, 1999, 102 : 423 - 430
  • [6] Rapid design method for interplanetary low-thrust transfer trajectory
    Shang, Haibin
    Cui, Pingyuan
    Luan, Enjie
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007, 28 (06): : 1281 - 1286
  • [7] Smooth and continuous interplanetary trajectory design of spacecraft using iterative patched-conic method
    Iwabuchi, Masakazu
    Satoh, Satoshi
    Yamada, Katsuhiko
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2021, 185 : 58 - 69
  • [8] Control Co-Design Optimization of Spacecraft Trajectory and System for Interplanetary Missions
    Harris, Gage W.
    He, Ping
    Abdelkhalik, Ossama O.
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2024, 61 (04) : 939 - 952
  • [9] Solar orbiter trajectory design
    Janin, G
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2003, PTS 1-3, 2003, 116 : 635 - 642
  • [10] SIMULTANEOUS OPTIMIZATION OF SPACECRAFT AND TRAJECTORY DESIGN FOR INTERPLANETARY MISSIONS UTILIZING SOLAR ELECTRIC PROPULSION
    Nicholas, Austin K.
    Woolley, Ryan C.
    Didion, Alan
    Laipert, Frank
    Olikara, Zubin
    Webb, Ryan
    Lock, Rob
    SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2019, VOL 168, PTS I-IV, 2019, 168 : 2855 - 2871