Selection and institutional shareholder activism in Chinese acquisitions

被引:8
|
作者
Peng, Fei [1 ]
Kang, Lili [1 ]
Jiang, Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Management, Sch Business, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Natl Accounting Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Selection; Institutional shareholders; Acquisition decision; Shareholders; Acquisitions and mergers; SHARE STRUCTURE REFORM; FREE CASH FLOW; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; SAMPLE SELECTION; WAGE COMPARISONS; AGENCY COSTS; CEO DUALITY; DARK SIDE; CORPORATE;
D O I
10.1108/00251741311291355
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to investigate the role that institutional shareholders play in acquisition decisions using micro data in the Chinese stock market during 2003-2008. Design/methodology/approach Acquisition decision is the selection and coordination process of shareholders as strategic alliances, which is determined by corporate acquisition ability, composition of institutional shareholders and concentration of tradable share (TS) in China. The paper uses the Heckman selection model to surmount the selection biases in acquisition decision. Findings The paper finds that institutional shareholders, including qualified foreign institutional investors (QFII), social security funds (SSF), security firms (SF) and security investment funds (SW), as well as TS concentration, affect acquisition probability rather than annual acquisition scale. SSF, SW and TS concentration can increase acquisition probability while QFII decreases it. Research limitations/implications This paper suggests a strategic alliance model in which institutional shareholders choose whether to collaborate with controlling shareholders and management. However, detailed information of the selection and coordination process is unavailable in the authors' data. Future research need provide more evidence of this postulate. Originality/value The paper contributes to the published literature in three ways. First, it offers a model to understand the selection and coordination process of acquisition decision. Second, it investigates whether institutional shareholders could effectively monitor annual acquisition scale. Third, it identifies the Heckman selection problem that institutional shareholders could affect PLCs' acquisition decision on whether to acquire rather than how much to acquire.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 162
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Institutional shareholder activism in Nigeria
    Uche, Chinyere
    Adegbite, Emmanuel
    Jones, Michael John
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2016, 16 (04): : 680 - 692
  • [2] Institutional Shareholder Activism and Limited Investor Attention
    Budsaratragoon, Pornanong
    Lhaopadchan, Suntharee
    Hillier, David
    [J]. REVIEW OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2010, 2 (02) : 106 - 124
  • [3] Institutional investors, shareholder activism, and earnings management
    Hadani, Michael
    Goranova, Maria
    Khan, Raihan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2011, 64 (12) : 1352 - 1360
  • [4] Institutional shareholder activism in Nigeria: An accountability perspective
    Uche, Chinyere O.
    Adegbite, Emmanuel
    Jones, Mike
    [J]. ACCOUNTING FORUM, 2016, 40 (02) : 78 - 88
  • [6] Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS
    Smith, MP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1996, 51 (01): : 227 - 252
  • [7] Legal reform and shareholder activism by institutional investors in Japan
    Seki, T
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2005, 13 (03) : 377 - 385
  • [8] Does institutional shareholder activism stimulate corporate information flow?
    Prevost, Andrew K.
    Wongchoti, Udomsak
    Marshall, Ben R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2016, 70 : 105 - 117
  • [9] Who's watching the watchers? Determinants of institutional shareholder activism
    Rubach, MJ
    Sebora, TC
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE 1998 PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 547 - 549
  • [10] Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors
    Gillan, SL
    Starks, LT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 57 (02) : 275 - 305